• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 minutes ago

    the most obvious one AI, totally not a even close at all, its just advanced wolfram alpha. or glass saying its “military grade, unbreakable” in this case of screen for phones, and for containers(like coffee), more than not its made with thinnest material to cut corners.

    another fun one is pyrex, pyrex lowercase uses a cheaper weaker glass laminated glass, while the og uses borosilicate(if you are buying the large dishes), some of the lunch box types are made with borosilicate. PYREX is no longer sold in the US, but mostly in the EU and maybe canada. however there is other borosilicate containers out there with varying durability.

    the “eco-friendly companies” telling you to buy thier products for carbon footprint reduction type of marketing, its largest funded by oil and gas to avoid reducing thier emissions.

    nHap toothpaste, questionable effects, as mos the positive effect seemed to be related to the added whitening/abrasive adjacents more than normal toothpaste.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      smart= data mining, and easier to become damaged forcing you to buy more because of all the unneccesary components that can break down"

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I signed up for the “ad free experience” on Amazon.

    Picked a movie, popup says “this feature is not available ad free”. Cancelled

    How is this legal? Oh yeah, Bezos was on the stage clapping with the other robber barons.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I gave up sailing the high seas during the golden age of streaming. Unfortunately it has already come to an end with the majority of streaming services including ads for their highest tier.

      I have wasted so much of my life on watching commercials, I refuse to waste anymore.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I have wasted so much of my life on watching commercials, I refuse to waste anymore.

        This, 100% this.

        Every streaming I have I pay the few extra bucks for ad free. Keep that fucking garbage out of my house.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Indestructible or tough dog toys. My boy will have that in pieces, 15 minutes or less guaranteed

    • Bubs12@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Indestructible toys are a catch 22, anyways. I found a couple of toys my old bud couldn’t destroy but he got bored of them very quickly. All of the satisfaction comes from the destruction.

      We just started getting him soccer balls from 5 Below. Cheap enough and big enough to last a little longer.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Only two things ever last in my house. Beef femors and nylahide chewable. Everything has a lifespan of minutes.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Same with my dog but hes not interested in the nylon or femurs, probably because he can’t figure out how to tear them apart.

        • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Same. They dislike them at first but they get bored with them quickly. I don’t mind them shredding toys as long as they don’t eat them.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    A “family size” bag of Doritos is not sized for a family. Or I on my own count as a family.

    “Military Grade” is not the flex that civilians think it is.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Tbf, a family-sized (now party-sized) bag of Doritos does contain a day’s worth of calories (2250) for a single person. I can’t keep them in the house, they call to me.

      I miss the old military surplus stores. 2/3 of the stuff was cheap crap, but every now and then you’d find something insane. I had this flat periscope, it was designed to go up through a slot on the roof of a tank. You could easily stand on it, and it wouldn’t have broken.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A “family size” bag of Doritos is not sized for a family.

      It should be the size of a family.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      A “family size” bag of Doritos is not sized for a family. Or I on my own count as a family.

      It’s enough for a family because the portion sizes are like 4 chips.

      Military grade

      This one is funny to me because the military commonly goes with the lowest bidder. So I take it to mean that “military grade” is absolute garbage made by the lowest bidder.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Not only that, but the US Military runs on state-of-the-art logistics. This means that military equipment can, and often is, incredibly high maintenance because you’re never far from a base that always has everything you need to keep it operational. In this environment, there’s no need to make anything super robust and reliable, so… they don’t.

        How state-of-the-art are we talking? Well, let me introduce you to forward-deployed Burger King.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Cereal is worse. I used to get regular sized. Then I got family sized. Now I try to hold out for “mega sized” for myself

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “Military grade” means “made by the cheapest contractor available, using sub-par materials, to juuuuuust meet the bare minimum requirements set by the government”.

        It’s like when housing developers advertise that all of their houses are “built to code”. Congrats, building code is the bare minimum requirement for the house to be considered habitable. It needs to be up to code to be able to sell. Someone advertising that a house is “built to code” is saying “we would build this worse if we were legally allowed to do so, but the law says we weren’t allowed to cut any more corners and still pass an inspection.”

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have been conditioned to think of “Free & Clear” as having no coloring or nasty scents added and then I come across this and was duped

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Flavored dish soap is kinda wild in general. Yes, I want the things I eat and drink off of to all taste vaguely of chemical lemons.

      The default should be plain soaps and plain dish detergent. Some are so potent that the scent sticks to the dishes even after washing, and unfortunately, the food too. Especially that dawn spray soap.

    • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is such bullshit manipulative marketing, similar to when companies will put out an ad saying something like “ONLY $1.99/MONTH” in large, bold letters and then below it have tiny fine print saying “for the first month, then $420.69/month”.

      “Free of dyes. Soft pear scent.”. Boom. Done. Not only is it short, but it’s clear and accurate. Almost nobody cares if it’s “clear” as long as it’s dye-free.

  • FackCurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    How whip cream is keto because the serving size is 1/2 teaspoon (5mL) and it’s less than 1 calorie (1kcal).

    LOL

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Keto is about carbohydrates, not calories. Whip cream (as long as you don’t do it with sugar) is absolutely keto, it has almost no carbs, despite the high calorie and fat count, but those are supposedly irrelevant on keto diets.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Keto != Low calorie.

      Generally it just means low carb as a marketing term. As a diet it’s an asinine amount of fat and whipped cream fits that bill. Especially if you can find low sugar whipped cream.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A lot of Keto “friendly” food have like 1g or 2g of carb, and a part from what you mentioned of the serving sized being unrealistic small, even if it wasn’t, they add up, if you consume a variety of this during the day you gonna exceed the maximum carb really easily.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Safe and secure” when it comes to digital transactions. Everything is logged, stored, and saved somewhere where they very often have absolutely fuck all in terms of security and then all that shit is hacked or leaked or otherwise compromised. But its okay, because the government will force them to give you 1 whole year of another bullshit service that does absolutely fucking nothing to protect your data or identity.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Not so much a lie but jumping on the bandwagon. A lot of traditional products that never had gluten in them to begin with now show “Gluten Free!” on the label, as if they did something good for you rather than simply redesigning a product label.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh yes, so many products claim this pointlessly.

      Gluten free beer, corn chips, ketchup, fruit snacks, dairy products, etc.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Unless you are hypersensitive to gluten, gluten free beer is nonsensical. A slice of bread contains 124,000 ppm of gluten. Lagers have 63 ppm, stouts 360 ppm, and ales can have up to 3,000 ppm. So even an ale has roughly 3% of the gluten a single slice of bread has.

          87% of beer sold in the US is a lager. That is .0005% of a slice of bread’s gluten.

    • Wren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Someone already mentioned the shared facilities thing that can lead to cross contamination. Another reason is: gluten-containing products aren’t intuitive. Soy sauce, malt vinegar, a lot of sauces and seasonings, most canned soups(where I live,) and some cheeses contain gluten.

    • tomatoely@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I feel like in that case it’s more like “We now double-check this food wasn’t made in the same area as foods with gluten”. Cross-contamination can be a pita for celiacs

      • unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Companies have gotten better about that over the years, but “gluten-free” products are still sometimes made on shared equipment with wheat which means it’s unsafe for celiacs. My SO is a celiac who only buys foods that are either certified gluten-free or labeled gluten-free and not made on shared equipment.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is not generally true. Organic farmer can use what most would consider synthetic pesticides. These are not technically synthetic because they are derived in a lab from organic material like petroleum.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If the farm is NOP certified then that’s what it means and products will be labeled “USDA Organic.”

        However the FDA doesn’t regulate the word “organic” so anyone can just slap the word on a product and call it a day.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t see an issue with this, things can be an improvement over their previous version and they would be new on release.

    • limer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Yes! Yes! At most this means a minor modification of what exists.

      If the innovations are truly enough to make it so different, its always marketed as a different product

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you live in a country that is not the US, these things are certified and taken seriously.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Organic is technically everything in the living world. The marketing version of organic is just that, marketing. There may be some regulations, but the devil is always in the details.

      This all leads to conundrums like organic farmers shunning organic pesticides. It really is nonsensical.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There are regulations around what you can call organic. Any issue you have here is probably more geared towards the laws themselves.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes, but there’s an implied meaning (still used) that doesn’t translate to legal meaning.

        Many years ago, organic required a few details on how it was grown/processed. Only the more expensive (and higher quality) items followed this, and were labeled organic. As such, people quickly associated ‘organic’ with ‘high quality’, and would pay the higher prices.

        Then Walmart saw the higher prices, and wanted to know the bare minimum needed to use the label. It was restricted by law, so they needed to meet the definition. And it turns out the definition is really easy to meet. So Walmart flooded the market with “organic” crap.

        Some people still pay a premium for it, partly because there’s no better indicator of quality.

  • StickyDango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    “No preservatives” - Sugar is a preservative. Salt is a preservative. Vinegar is a preservative. Lemon juice is a preservative.

    “Sugar-free” - but they add alternative sweeteners that have a range of other health issues associated with them.

    “Cholesterol-free” - I once saw this on a juice container and had a laugh.

    What people don’t realise is that with food formulation, what you take out, you have to put something back in to replace it. A low/no sugar product will likely be higher in something else like fat to make it a palatable product… So labels make claims on some things, but will purposely not mention the others.

    Edit: Yay! 100th comment!

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      “Sugar free” is such a red flag, you know they are going to go crazy with the artificial crap. I try to eat less sugar but the same goes for alternative sweeteners, plus I can’t stand the taste of them. I look for “Sugar free” so I know not to buy it, that shit’s going to be disgusting.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “Nitrate free! *except for that found naturally in the shitload of powdered celery we put in there”

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Cholesterol-free is such a bullshit label anyway because dietary cholesterol doesn’t do anything special to your own cholesterol. You are not a chicken and the egg yolk will not go directly to your bloodstream. Your blood has human cholesterol that you made yourself from the rest of the sugars and fats you ate, digested, converted, stored, and reeconverted.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I give “gluten free” a pass because it’s not always obvious. Some people do have very severe reactions and some products do, unsuspectingly, contain gluten in the form of filler content or for some other mechanical use. Sausage is specifically known to use wheat product as filler and binder. Same for deli meats and veggie burgers. Some places will even throw breadcrumbs into their ground beef for burgers to fake it’s tenderness, so it crumbles like a meatloaf would.

          Then there’s seasonings. Potato chips are made from potatoes, right? But not all chips are potato chips. You’d hope a gluten-issue person would be able to identify pita chips or bagged crackers from the chips selection would have gluten, but it turns out, despite being a corn chip, Dorito dust can affect gluten sensitivities. Soy sauce and malt vinegar are issues, and seasoning mixes use flour to help distribution

          • StickyDango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Oh, and processing aids. That’s another kettle of fish. Same with things that are added and then taken out, or vice versa, as long as they are the same amounts, they don’t have to be on the label unless it’s an allergen. (Australia)

            I’m always wary of places that cook or bake their own food, especially home businesses. They don’t have the money to pay an accredited food lab to do their labels and testing for them. I’ve done my share of food label auditing, and I’ve seen some pretty shocking things.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Sausage is specifically known to use wheat product as filler and binder.

            That is actually illegal in my country.