• inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m willing to bet 100 dollars that this will go nowhere with the help of Democratic leadership and their members voting against it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The number of co-sponsors has risen to 70 since this was published

      Only one third of the minority party in the House.

      Like, I’m not even mad at them. I just wish the party had over 70 people with more than an ounce of ethics or a gram of self-preservation instinct.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the face of fascist paramilitary death squads going door to door, you can’t even get every Dem to agree the fascist paramilitary death squads should be abolished.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Great to see it happening, but I wish a Republican introduced it. Not only would it show there’s a break for reason, but it’d also prevent it from being labeled a Democratic hoax, give it a reasonable chance of making it to the Senate, allow some Republicans to show an ounce of reasonableness to the cult’s face, reassure some allies that the party in charge hasn’t completely lost its mind, and serve as a warning to the cult.

    • TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You sure you really want that? If republicans start backing off now, people will forget all this, repubs will start winning elections again, the country will carry on like none of this ever happened, and we’ll be right back here a few cycles from now. The only way to solve this problem for any length of time is to follow it to its bitter end, anything else is just kicking the can down the road.

  • rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    What consequences? An angry letter from democrats asking to please stop?

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      At worst she gets to go home to her millions of dollars, gets a TV deal, and America stays on the exact same course.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right now Democrats are in the minority. This is effectively demonstration that when they’re in power, there will be prosecution

      • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Its funny you think they will do anything if they have power because history says otherwise.

        This is a good thing but let’s not delude ourselves too much. They are only doing this because Noam is an easy target and functionally not much will change even if she is impeached.

        It’s all optics. Good optics - it’s good policy and good politics imo - but not indicative of a fundamental shift in blatant opposition like we’d like it to be.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lol. Its almost like you pay no attention to things like the Inflation Reduction Act and then claim that because you didn’t pay attention, they did nothing.

          Just negging

          • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            What did the inflation reduction act do? Like materially how did it makes peoples lives better? Did people get better healthcare? Did the unhomed get housing? Did the starving get food? Did the unemployed get jobs?

            What did it DO?

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              It started creating a ton of jobs in the renewable energy and electric vehicles space to cut the cost of electricity and getting around.

              Republicans repealed it once they came to power

              • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Do you see the point I am making at least? I’m not even saying it’s bad I’m just saying it’s not a meaningful fix for the systemic issues. It’s a bandaid on top of a wound that we are hemorrhaging from profusely.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You want huge systemic change, it takes giving Democrats a 75% supermajority like they had to pass rhe New Deal. You dont get it by giving them a situation where picking off a single marginal vote with a bribe can derail legislation

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean impeaching cabinet members is kind of pointless innit? Trump can easilly find a replacement that is functionally identical. You have to cut the head off VP+President at the very least. But really just skip all that bullshit and start advocating for a Constitutional Convention, the US government is broken and a CC is the only non-violent option.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why would you want a constitutional convention? Ratification of a constitutional amendment requires acceptance by 75% of state legislatures. 60% of state legislatures are controlled by Republicans, which as I’m sure you know is the party causing the vast majority of the problems you are referring to. Nothing good would come from that unless you are the type who wants to enshrine anti-DEI bullshit in the constitution.

    • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Any new appointments would have to go through congressional approval. Of course they could potentially get rubber stamped by the Republican controlled Senate, but they are losing support of some of the Republicans in the Senate so it’s not a guarantee right now. I believe Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) have both stated publicly that they will block any appointments to the Federal Reserve so I can see them or others potentially doing the same for other appointments. This being an election year probably has a lot of them considering how they can save face for what they’ve let occur over the last year. I’m still making a lot of assumptions so who knows what would happen.

    • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      No. Following procedure maintains a sense of lawful government. While the act will fail, we will have a record if we ever get back to freedom.