- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
You must log in or # to comment.
Only the royals are allowed to enjoy incest
Oi you got a wanking loicense for that
Ofcom has said there is no way to stop Brits from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to dodge the age checks.
With a VPN, you can access parts of the internet which might be blocked in your region, as the service ‘masks your IP address, and lets you sidestep website blocks and firewalls on the internet’, according to Microsoft.
According to the BBC, Ofcom has said that platforms must not host, share or permit content encouraging the use of VPNs.
Speaking to the outlet, the government has also said that under the Online Safety Act, it will be illegal for sites to do this.
Final goal of course is to ban VPNs, something they coded as authoritarian because they said China does it (they do not) so they have to invent a reality in which VPNs somehow terrorize kids.
Half of YouTube content and podcasts must be banned for having a nordvpn sponsorship
People.who feel sad about it will now get to see more betterhelp sponsorships. Capitalism breeds solutions.
Crusader Kings Enjoyers:
ugh… what are you DOING, step-government
Oi, Step-bruv, you got a loicense for helpin’ me out a’ the dryah?
Big brother is watching
Utterly pointless. This entire genre of porn exists as a replacement for pizza guy or delivery person porn. It is just a story gimmick to explain why the 2 people in the scene are at the same house and because having an imaginary hot step-sibling is easier for more people to imagine than having a delivery job.
I want to know who is putting the labour party up to this because it’s really quite ridiculous.
I think theres more to it, its all about dudes getting laid and “being taken care of” with absolute zero (even minus) effort, thats not really a thing in delivery person porn.
Well yeah because the delivery person is the dude in those. In this version the dude doesn’t do anything except get out of bed and not even that in some cases.
that might be sociologically correct but we need a genre shift off that shit
We don’t need anything if it’s not actually harmful in any measurable way. I’ve seen no evidence of such. If I see actual evidence of that then sure, but I otherwise side with not policing any of this stuff on the basis of it making some people uncomfortable because there’s a lot of other things that I don’t want laws against for the same reason.
but have you considered that i personally dislike it?
UK is really focusing hard on porn lately. I guess better to focus on that and trans issues then actually helping people.
I bet birth control is next. They need us to pump out lots of new workers to keep the machine running. I’m beginning to think refusing to reproduce is one of the most radical acts we can take.
“Unsafe online videos” unsafe for who
Not even going for the “teen” category?
They don’t want to ban their favorite category
they’re just mad it’s fake incest
Oi, wut now? We can’t havuh roit wank to abit a noncery flic of me step-sisso? This is roit un-bri-ish it is, God save teh King, we gon run outta royals if we don git this fixed sooone!!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
