• pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, you could get a piece of land in Siberian tundra at any time, I would not call that housing.

    Moving to a city was way more complicated than in capitalist US. You could not simply buy an apartment. You had to be allocated an apartment by the government. And you needed connections for that. Or bribes. Ideally both. If you think your local rabid Republicans do not care for little wage slave men, you never experienced USSR, it was like that but 100x worse.

      • pelya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. And networking would inevitably involve vodka. All major decisions would eventually involve vodka in USSR.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Vodka had been linked to the Russian economy under multiple Czars. I’m not sure that Stalin could have separated the two even if he had wanted to. Admittedly it doesn’t appear that he wanted to.

            I’m pretty sure that the USSR was screwed the moment that Lenin returned from exile in Germany, or when Wilson was elected. Take your pick.

            The Menchaviks would have been a better government.

            • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just find it ironic that Stalin was everything that the party worried about Trotsky becoming.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The mechaviks literally wanted to continue ww1 and have a psuedo democracy where the bourgeoisie were literally guaranteed a majority of seats, wtf are you talking about?

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I wasn’t aware of that. I was under the impression they were less extreme than the Bolsheviks, and didn’t want to execute everyone that wasn’t a hard core Bolshevik

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They were more extreme than the bolseviks but less extreme than the monarchists, they were just on the side of capitalists so were painted with a nicer brush by capitalist historians