• vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ngl teams is trash. Especially when IT keeps messing with settings they don’t understand.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Easily the worst popular messaging app out there. Even on windows the thing barely ever worked for me and hogged a bunch of system resources to boot

      As with many messaging apps only thing keeping it alive is the network effect (and integration with 365)

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You moved your mouse near the calendar? LET ME CREATE A MEETING FOR YOU!

        You opened up a card from a planning board? LET ME TRUNCATE THE TITLE SO YOU CAN’T READ IT!

        You opened a document? HAHA CAN’T DO THAT FROM YOUR IP BUT YOU WON’T GET AN ERROR MESSAGE JUST AN INFINITELY SPINNING DOODAD!

        I wish they just copied better apps like the Microsoft of old did.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh you want to use the default audio devices on your system? What default audio devices I’m going to use this random loopback device and your monitor with no speakers!

          • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I have had to help so many end users with that it pains me.

            “How can I stop this from happening again?”

            Well, we can disable.other audio devices, but seeing as it’s Windows 11 they may just re-enable good luck!

            I ran into a user who’s noise cancellation stopped working upon the rollout of “New” Teams. Tried diagnosing the microphone array, settings updates, firmware. No luck.

            Know what worked? Both versions of browser based Teams!!! Ihatethemihatethemihatethem

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Never heard of any Windows re-enabling disabled audio devices.

              Deleted devices sure, because it automatically installs drivers of “new” devices so they automatically work for even technologically incapable users.

              Did you run the Windows troubleshooter for that New Teams bug? Contrary to popular believe in the Sysadmin circles, those actually work pretty well.

              • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not the windows troubleshooter, as the mic was otherwise fine. There was nothing I could find in any Teams settings, and the admin panel showed all of the telemetry as being fine.

            • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s a stupid solution, but have the user download voicemod, then use voicemod as the default microphone in teams. It’s stupid, but it solves all these problems.

      • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is Teams a messaging app? 😮‍💨 Then please give me a way to sort and group my chats.

    • Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      As someone near in the administration of it, Microsoft are at fault, they permanently make breaking changes for no obvious reason

      • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        My boss has gotten to the point of “As Ashe would say, fucking Microsoft”

        Let’s not forget the endless name changes, 404’d documentation that points to non existent tools all of the time, the GUI that barely works. Always an adventure

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      IT enforced background blur for GDPR reasons. You simply couldn’t turn it off, so everybody was blurred during the daily standup.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        The sound of thousands of underpowered integrated graphics processors, their fans screaming in agony.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Most people have workstation laptops with Nvidia Quadro’s so that’s not really an issue.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sounds like a win to me.

        We don’t even use Cameras anymore for anything except explicitly scheduled one-on-one meetings like Quarterly Review.

      • TwoCubed@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I despise these blurred backgrounds. I understand if you use it when working from home and don’t have a dedicated office, but so many people do it even when they’re at the corporate office. The flickering is just super annoying.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      My old place had something screwed up where I lost audio after about 30 seconds into a meeting on teams. Constantly using my phone for audio sucked.

  • HauntedBucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Beats WebEx. I contracted at Cisco after they had bought WebEx and the dev teams had to stagger their scrums in the morning because WebEx infra couldn’t support all the meetings at once.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        What? Skype was waay better than Teams! It only started turning into dogshit when Microsoft acquired it.

        **Edit: Skype, not “Skype For Business”, as others pointed out.

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Skype for Business was not Skype. It was the rebranded Office Communicator, which Microsoft started calling Skype for Business after acquiring Skype.

          It was basically a bad clone of MSN Messenger.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Imagine if it had actively been developed this whole time rather than snatched up and shuttered to further anti-competitive practices…

      • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Actually we just finished our switch from Skype to Teams and honestly, as much as I love having GIFs to express my disdain for work, at least Skype could group chats, didn’t require all the RAM in the world, and automatically saved chats which, in a records management hellscape was an absolute lifesaver. Also my headphones would automatically answer a call when I put them on my head but I have a feeling that has more to do with the settings than anything else.

        Also I’m tired of having to tell people “no we can’t do that because Microsoft hasn’t integrated that very valuable and highly requested feature you’re asking for”

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just transitioned from a Google + slack company to a Microsoft account company.

    I asked if we put our email accounts on our phones to be able to answer after hours, my supervisor said very few people are given access to emails on their phones.

    I am fine with the switch, I used to get 40-60 emails to sort through a day. Now I will be doing maybe 5-10 a day and only 3 or 4 might actually be for me and I only have an 8 hour day with no after hours meetings.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve had a company require employees to install MDM on personal phones (remote control/management) to be allowed to use them for 2fa app or email access… there was a surprised Pikachu when I refused. Eventually they issued me a company phone, because it was impossible to do most tasks without 2fa. That device was on 9 to 5 only.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But why would anyone?

        I have an MDM on my work phone and I can’t even access PlayStore anymore. It only allows Company Allowed Apps which is to say nothing. YouTube is broken because MDM somehow controls my DNS records. Firefox cannot be installed so Ads everywhere. Chrome only and it can only go to approved websites because Yahoo is safe but Ars Technica is not???

        Why would anyone want that on a device they pay for?

        Is my MDM different from their MDM?

        • aicse@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          MDM can be configured in 2 modes, one with company owned devices and one with bring your own device. But there are lots of settings that can be done, usually it is configured with work and personal profiles and the work one has all the restrictions in place and the personal has no limits. Maybe just some device features can be also enforced, like forbid the OEM unlock and ADB.

      • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remote control of your personal phone for work? That sounds dodgey, I would definitely refuse. Would anyone actually accept that?

        Also, 2fa is a really shit excuse for that.

        • tty5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Less than 2% of workforce got issued a company phone for that reason.

          Any device required MDM installed to get access to VPN that got you to company network, to get 2fa app, SSO or email.

          • Patches@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Sounds like they’re respecting work life balance in a round-about way.

            No Boss, I didn’t get that email sent at 11 PM last night. I don’t sit in front of my PC at all hours of the day.

        • tty5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Over 98% did. My job was security adjacent so I’ve had some insight into those metrics

          • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I work in IT and endpoint management is among my tasks. Knowing the things we can do to smartphones that are controlled by our mdm is enough to where I would never agree to having thatopn my personal device. I even refused to get a company provided smartphone.

            • tty5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              Same.

              It was kind of fun, because I joined the company as a part of acquihire and they came to my entire team to install MDM on our laptops. It turned out we were mostly running Linux, while their MDM was Windows and MacOS only. They left…

              They came back 2 weeks later to tell us it would be best if we installed Windows. We told them “no, thank you” to which they responded with surprised pikachu, because they were used to their suggestions being treated as commands. So they left again.

              A month later they came back to tell us we really should install Windows to which we responded that we’d have to rebuild out entire tooling and we’re on tight deadlines as-is. It’s important to note that their Windows setup didn’t allow VMs…

              Some time later we got an email to let us know MDM vendor will soon have Linux beta. Does it support Arch and Nixos? They’ll get back to us on that. And we started researching how hard would it be to run BSD on a laptop ;-)

              Ah, the confidence boost you get when you know your job is absolutely secure and the only reason you don’t quit is because of a retention bonus :D

        • tty5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Because the only 2FA allowed was onelogin push. Don’t ask me why.

          They also used an “enterprise” VPN that was acquired by some larger company, was pretty much abandoned at that point and only worked with a proprietary client that took days to set up on Linux - this was fun for me and all my colleagues who ended at that sad company as a result of an acquihire and were 80% devs running linux.

    • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      They must have some intense data retention policies. You can configure compliance levels to allow anyone into their Outlook acct using the app without any special permissions pretty easily.

      Good on them to cut down access like that

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Now I wonder if there’s a correlation between companies using Microsoft package being companies less obsessed with crunch culture…

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But … why?

      Outlook on phones works well enough. Was it some security measurement or something?

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        My particular company emails contain privilege information and there is absolutely zero trust in letting smart phones aka roaming data leaks anywhere near that.

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean it doesn’t matter to me, I don’t want to take my work home with me and I’m close to the computer while I’m at work.

      • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is normally a security thing. Unless the company has managed mobile devices, you don’t want company data on a personal cell phone.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t particularly like the UI, but I haven’t had any Issue with teams ever tbh. It even worked on Firefox with uBlock, NoScript (ofc allowing like one or two domains for it) and VPN. For me, Office in general just works most of the time. I would never use it for private stuff, let alone pay hundreds for it, but for work it’s more than fine.

    Except Outlook. Holy fuck, how is such a central application such a pile of steaming garbage? It has the worst UI/UX I have ever seen in any mail client by far.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same. Teams isn’t exactly good, but it works pretty okayish most of the time. I absolutely don’t get the love for slack, it seems to be more like an “I use Arch, BTW” thing.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes. And it’s okay, but nothing to write home about.

          I mean, it’s a messenger. Nothing more. Don’t overhype something that trivial.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Lol there’s a difference between overhyping and being upset that you were forced to move from a superior chat program to a slower, less efficient and more difficult to use program (Teams)

            Edit: Found the Microsoft employee down voting me lmao

    • vocornflakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Outlook is a fucking mess. I wanted to search for a keyword in a long-ass email yesterday, so of course I did ^F, like a normal person would. That opened the dialog to write and send a reply??? Why???

      And web browser outlook having no keyboard shortcuts whatsoever is fucking criminal.

    • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m forced to have two separate Outlook accounts, I quite literally can not use both accounts on the same computer without getting stuck in a neigh inescapable login loop from hell.

      • fusionsaint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        If your job has Office365 access, use the web version of Outlook. You can open multiple accounts in separate tabs and the interface isn’t from 1995. I have multiple boxes I have to run and this saved me from having to constantly log in and log out of Outlook.

        • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I typically use the web version and multiple tabs, but it still doesn’t work. I think it might have something to do with my organization trying to force all the traffic through their own log in page and outlook having no idea what account to associate where.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Fuck Slack, Google Chat and Workplace.

    Companies abuse it’s use instead of using emails and tickets, it’s fucking chaos.

    Yeah let’s make people contact us through this public chat, all at once, I’m sure it won’t be a fucking mess.

      • Kurokujo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, channel management is super important. It’s useful to have a full featured chat client that can integrate into other systems, but it’s important to know what the limitations are. We use Slack for internal chat only (no customers) and it works pretty well for our use case but with all the integrations available it could easily get out of hand if we let more people manage it.

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        In a previous job I was before we were pretty clear about our channels, and WE (3 people) were the Service Desk.

        But after that I worked in a specific area of the IT of a multinational DIY stores chain and what a fucking mess.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ah, the digital Neighbor to: You can stand by my desk but no ticket no help

        Not going to let people cut in line in front of the people who do follow the procedures correctly.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      IMHO, you need to know how to admin a good slack workplace. Properly setup workflows, bots and plugins can proactively funnel a lot of people toward the correct intake and resolution systems. You also need to train people on best practices, and revisit that training so bad habits don’t set in.

      Training + automation are kind of required to make any communication platform effective.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Uhm… Have you considered that slack has cat picture plugins?

      And meme plugins, and 30 other plugins that look for keywords then spam gifs for what you assume can only be an in joke before your time?

      Oh, and one of the plugins actually creates tickets from chat, but jira is down and the guy who maintains it is busy writing a panda facts plug-in. So now it just vomits out an error message so everyone avoids the words “ticket”, “issue”, and “status”

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “I am very busy and have my work day planned to work efficiently, so I won’t be handling your request immediately. This means things can slip through cracks if there is no ticked describing the task created - create one if what you are asking for is of any importance.”

      Followed by not doing anything that doesn’t have a ticket and didn’t come directly from people you report to.

      Also I have notifications disabled and only check slack between tasks or if I take a breather from a task - on average 4-5 times a day. I also check email as the first and last thing in a workday only

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah… in this DIY company I complained to my manager why other deparments didn’t create a ticket for requests/incidents for us.

        The response was because tickets would cost money to the deparments! What the actual fuck?

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    In Teams I can’t use my system volume to control Bluetooth headphones… drives me bananas. Especially because one of my coworkers has a loud mic

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s the dumbest fucking part of teams, half of the problems that make people hate it are simple dumb shit like this that just prove they, like every other fucking company, prioritize business facing improvements, to the detriment of any user level improvement. IM LOOKING AT YOU AUTODESK!

    • beneeney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have so many issues using Teams with a normal headset. I went into sound settings, and turned off exclusive access to the device. I disabled communication devices. I turned off the sync buttons setting in Teams. Yet Teams still loves to randomly unmute my mic even when it’s muted from the PHYSICAL button. Makes no sense

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      You probably can. The issue is that most bt headsets mount themselves as a pair of stereo headphones, and a handsfree kit. And for some weird reason Teams will ONLY EVER broadcast audio to the handsfree kit. If you change the volume control to the handsfree kit, blam, you can change the volume.

      • cmeu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It isn’t just teams. That’s how the hardware is implemented and it also means that you cannot have high quality audio and use the mic at the same time. It’s actually Windows, not the bt device or the app.

        Legacy decisions that keep getting carried forward

      • b000rg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I figured out you can disable Bluetooth telephony services if you navigate deep into the printers and other devices control panel. But this might also disable the mic. I’m not able to test it right now.

  • jecht360@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    We use Slack for those of us on the IT team, but Teams for everyone else. I despise Teams.

  • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Google + Slack is pure unadulterated garbage. Gotta wonder what Teams is like if you suddenly develop nostalgy for a flaming dumpster.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I went from an MS+Teams org to a Google+Slack org. The latter is way better, Teams is a steaming pile of wank.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have a lot of grudges with Google and slack, but I have tried Teams exactly once and I never want to have to deal with this software again

    • Axolotl@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yesterday Teams decided I don’t need a microphone. It just mutes me after a few seconds. Only thing I can do is unmute myself every few seconds.

  • icedcoffee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Microsoft actively hates its users. Why are all of the keyboard shortcuts in the most inconvenient place possible? Why does Outlook not mark mail as read/unread in an intuitive way? Why does Teams schedule send require one tap on mobile but two clicks on desktop? Also this isn’t even the thread to get into whatever tf is going on with LinkedIn. Planting seeds and harvesting crops was a mistake.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know if I could deal with this bullshit. I work at such a small office we don’t do anything but calls, faxes, and shitloads of emails. The odd side text sometimes. Adding a whole chat space thing where I’m constantly on the hook for a reply would do my head in.

    • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sometimes people have wrong opinions, don’t worry it happens to the best of us (/s)

        • summerof69@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What kind of surveillance? I remember 6 years ago an admin of a paid org on Slack could download all conversations, including private.

          • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Any work tool is like that, including slack and teams. If you’re using a corporate device or tool paid for/managed by your employer, you have no privacy whatsoever. If you’re using the internet at work, IT knows at least which sites you visit

            Usually the logs/conversations don’t get read, they just have words that get flagged (from swear words to drugs to who knows what else), the rest is mainly in case something happens they can look into it more and maybe cover their ass.

            That said, I bet more data goes to microsoft from teams than goes to slack from slack, so in that case I bet slack is a bit better

          • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Most work/ school comms software is, and anyway if it isn’t encrypted they can just ask for it and Microsoft will probably give it to them

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I use Slack for personal projects and Teams for work. I think both are fine. The main reason it made sense to use Teams at work was because there were a number of products in use by different teams. IT had Slack and the rest had Zoom. Zoom was raising their costs and we already had Teams as part of 0365. So it was either buy Slack licenses for the entire company or just get everyone on Teams. It was kind of a no-brainer and it was hard to come up with a convincing argument to pay for Slack for everyone other than “Microsoft bad”.

      • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s funny you mention that about teams and O365. Microsoft just announced O/M365 licenses will be sold without Teams now, in the US. Something something antitrust lawsuit.

  • Spoilt@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We have Skype + Mattermost (without gifs) + Rainbow. Give me Teams if you want, but please, stop adding tools.

      • Spoilt@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Either our mattermost is not up to date, or it has been disabled by the administrators. In any case, I have no power to do anything

    • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      We were forcibly moved from Mattermost to Teams (because cost) and the lack of custom emotes is sorely felt throughout the company. I never counted, but I wouldn’t have been at all surprised if we’d had >100 of them. So many in-jokes gone forever.

  • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Microsoft’s O365 stack and Teams aren’t great, my friend, but they’re light years ahead of anything Google and Slack offer. Especially when any sort of collaboration is involved.

      • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is no way you’re using either on a constant basis. He is right. It’s not a great setup, but it beats the brakes off of workspace+slack.

    • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The collaboration features in 365 fuck up and get in the way a lot more often than they work correctly WITH ONLY TWO CONCURRENT USERS. Conversely, I’ve seen entire classrooms in Google Docs working together like it wasn’t even a thing.

      I don’t have a lot of love for any of these companies, but what you are saying is objectively false.

    • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Completely wrong. The Microsoft word collaboration is completly Terrible, constantly locks other people from editing even if they are on another part of the page. It really doesn’t work for more than 2 people, while you can have like 30 people on a google doc with no issues (probably more, haven’t tried more).

      Also, I blocked beehaw, why can I see your comment

      • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can’t dispute that. I’m not a Word person. I live in Excel and often have half a dozen people working in the same file without issue, but that’s much more logically structured than a Word document. Google’s team sites are also disjointed and janky af compared to Sharepoint.

        • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Excel is far superior to google sheets, you can’t go past z on google, while on excel you can go to like zzz or something.

          Word however, simply doesn’t work with multiple people in a usable way.