Talking about JD Vance, he said

And I gotta tell you, I can’t wait to debate the guy.

That is, if he’s willing to get off the couch and show up.

…See what I did there?

The rest of his speech is worth a watch, to see just how good of a pick he really was.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vance has proved an absolutely terrible pick for Trump so far. It’s completely derailed his campaign and given the Democrats multiple new non-doomsday attack lines which they desperately needed. If Harris actually manages to win the presidency against all odds, people will look back to the Vance selection as the moment when Trump and MAGA started celebrating before they’d crossed the finish line.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I think picking Walz will have far more impact than Vance, since Republicans will vote party anyway and the real hurdlenfor Dems to win is increasing turnout.

      Walz will increase turnout even more than Harris’ excellent start to her campaign because they should be very effective as a duo both willing to dish it back.

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sort of baffling why he picked Vance - what exactly does he bring to the table? All the polling I’ve seen suggest Republicans don’t really like him, and that’s been Trump’s game to just get his supporters more excited…

      Pence made sense, because he brought a segment that Trump has no connection to

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Trump is a narcissist and needs to pick someone who doesn’t overshadow himself in any way and will be subservient to his every whim.

        There’s not many options after those criteria.

      • zhunk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hubris. They were up in the polls at the time and didn’t think they needed to expand their appeal, so they caved and took Thiel’s guy.

      • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        he was energizing when he was first announced, and he was viewed as an effective “messenger” in the same way that Walz is. Clearly the Trump & Co skimped on vetting JD ahead of time, though.