- Did they shoot down another civilian airliner recently? - https://www.euronews.com/2024/12/25/azerbaijani-passenger-plane-crashes-near-kazakh-city-of-aktau - Russian air defence missile incident emerges as likely cause of Azerbaijan Airlines crash - EDIT: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijan_Airlines_Flight_8243 - Right. Not the result of a SAM… this time. - Edit: Good meme though. - Edit 2: I was wrong. My bad. I misread something when the news broke. It was those POS Russians and SAM. Again. - wdym not result of SAM   - It clearly fell from a window 
- Those are definitely caused by birds /s. - clearly suicide - Yeah, stupid pilots keep tossing their cans out the window. 
 
- mutant chickens from girkin’s biolab 
 
- Late response because I’m on vacation: - I was wrong. Thanks for your post. Vile Putin. 
- Tbf it looks like FLAK more than anything else. - What’s the Russian equivalent of the Gepard? - FlAK stands for FlugAbwehrKanone, meaning air defence cannon. What you mean is shrapnel, which air defence missiles use to shoot down planes. - The Gepard is a SHORAD system using airburst autocannons to hit stuff, but airliners usually fly too high for that. The Russian equivalents from newest to older systems are the Pantsir, the Tunguska and the Shilka, IDK if they still use Shilkas though. - Gerpard does not use airburst, it needs to directly hit. The rounds have a timed fuse to avoid hitting the ground, so they explose after some seconds. - wait doesn’t gepard use AHEAD, what was all that fuss with swiss refusing reexport of that special ammo 
 
- plane was hit at about 3km, so within range of even MANPADS and pantsir guns, but it was a bit misty so IR and photocontrast guidance is out. azeris suspect command guided pantsir missile, that is 57e6 or similar, which has some 7x less explosive than buk missile used in mh17 shootdown - shilkas are still good against drones so i suspect they do use them. ukrainians use everything down to 12.7mm and 7.62mm machine guns for this purpose 
- Schrapnell like the ones of FlaK-Explosivgeschosse you say? 
 
- they don’t have anything like that, if you mean programmable airburst ammunition - Hm, yeah, that’s ehat I meant. - But surely a SAM wouldn’t have gone unnoticed? - i think that crash gave plenty of notice 
 
 
 
- Those are not the markings that a Surface-to-Air-Missile leaves on a plane. I’d reckon those look more like bullet holes - ETA: I know less than I thought. My bad 
- Looks more like guns than a missile, but what do I know. - irregular, non-circular holes make me think fragments more than anything else 
- What sort of gun produces so many holes of so varying sizes, let alone that accurately? Or do you mean they randomly unloaded once or was on the ground? - Same kind of damage as on MH17 which was a BUK missile if I remember correctly. It basically explodes near the target like a big handgrenade causing scattered damage like this. 
 
- Could be flak explosion. 
 
 
- It was though? Unless the Russian missile that struck the plane was air launched or something. - birdstrike by Su-34 or Mig-29 
 
 
 
 
- It’s time to take out these motherfuckers, EU what the hell are you all waiting for! - The US to step in and do it for them, as per usual. - I never thought I’d say this but maybe, just maybe the crazy trump rhetoric might have a positive influence on this. 
 
- Bro what the fuck did you smoke? Didn’t countless wars taught you anything - Didn’t “peace in our time” teach you anything? Seems like you’re the one smoking too much. 
 
 
- Looking forward for the MentorPilot video on this one 










