silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-25 days agoBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-25 days agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoMaybe. That assumes the SCOTUS actually gives a damn, which they’ve routinely shown that they don’t.
minus-squareHirom@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 days agoIt would take months to go through court system until SCOTUS finally make a decision. In the worst case, even if they overturn the decision to protect waters, it would still delay drilling.
minus-squaredoingthestuff@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoOr he could just ask Congress to reverse it, done.
Maybe. That assumes the SCOTUS actually gives a damn, which they’ve routinely shown that they don’t.
It would take months to go through court system until SCOTUS finally make a decision. In the worst case, even if they overturn the decision to protect waters, it would still delay drilling.
Or he could just ask Congress to reverse it, done.
They could indeed. I hope not.