I used to say “Welcome to Lemmy” to new joiners, but nowadays quite a few of them join Piefed instance, having a generic term is easier

You can’t follow Mastodon users from Lemmy or Piefed, using “Fedivers” seems too generic

Previous post on the same topic: https://lemmy.zip/post/33451610

    • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gemini is both the Google AI and the network protocol, it seems clear which one you’re referring to depending on context

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arguably the context is very similar - it makes it seem like Threads is part of the “Threadiverse”. AFAIK it’s not? The fact that I don’t know is rather telling.

      • squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        And the word meta itself is used for meta communities on the Threadiverse which have nothing to do with Meta the company. Words existed before companies took them.

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        To us maybe, as we already know what the fediverse is. To newcomers and people who haven’t really heard of it yet, it sounds like Threads and its associated software.

        I’ve been on here for about two years, and I’m pretty sure that you were here before me. This stuff is part of our everyday language, whereas most people haven’t heard of Lemmy, Piefed, or Mbin. They’ve all seen the ads for Threads though

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just call it Fediverse.

    Fediverse can be part. Fediverse can be all. Fediverse is the all that federates with the bit. Fediverse ought. Fediverse will be. It’s even on Poob. Poob will federate it for you. Poob will federate it for you.

    • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t make sense to tell someone “Welcome to the Fediverse” when they join Piefed or Lemmy as they can’t follow Mastodon or Sharkey users

      • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s still the Fediverse. While things are connected, not everything has to be absolutely connected. There’s still work to be done.

        You can waxing poetically it if you want. “Welcome to our little corner of the Fediverse” etc.

        Or, if you are really that hung up on this not being the Fediverse, call it the Lemmyverse or smth.

        • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s still the Fediverse. While things are connected, not everything has to be absolutely connected. There’s still work to be done.

          Except that’s the premise new joiners are told when they join the Fediverse “everything is connected”.

          Turns out it’s not, you have Mbin/PieFed/Lemmy on one side, then Mastodon/Sharkey/Iceshrimp on another, and the support between both is rudimentary, as people commented below

          • Fitik@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            and the support between both is rudimentary, as people commented below

            Not on Mbin at least… I follow plenty of people from Mastodon/Other services from this MBin account and interact with them time from time

          • Tuukka R@piefed.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Each threadiverse community is visible as a single user in Mastodon. All the comments come into one pile, not organized into clear threads. It’s a very rudimentary support. But yeah, you can join a threadiverse conversation from Mastodon, but you cannot share any Mastodon content in threadiverse.

            From within Lemmy, there is zero possibility to utter anything on Mastodon, except as a reply to a message a Mastodon user has made in a threadiverse community.

            It’s actually very easy checking how this conversation looks from within Mastodon! Just go to any Mastodon instance (such as http://mastodontti.fi/ ) with your web browser, click the search tool and search for a “user” called @fediverse@piefed.social .

        • julian@activitypub.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Lemmy and Mastodon can interact (yay federation!) but you can’t follow microblog users from Lemmy.

          Up until recently, communities couldn’t follow other communities, because it’s just not a “thing” Lemmy or Piefed do. Users follow communities, yeah?

          Except NodeBB tries to have communities follow communities. :)

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Threadiverse is fine with me. Fediverse in general, but Threadiverse is more specific imo. We’re early on the Fedi, we get to make the rules! Square is blue! Up is left and right is forward. MUAHAHAHAHA! :-D

  • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yup I personally always use threadiverse and love to use threadiverse.link instead of lemmyverse.link

    Maybe I missed something but never saw a problem with that name.

    Edit: wanted to add that voyager has also started to use threadiverse.link as a share option (i believe lemsha.re as well but that service shut down).

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The only concern I’ve seen with the name is that Facebook named their thing “Threads”, and so it might be confusing for people familiar with that.

      I still use the term 🤷

        • dil@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was feeling like older twitter for a little bit but enough ppl joined and now the algorithim is the same trash modern x is.

      • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ahhh that was the problem! Okay I kinda understand. But I think we can refuse to let that asshole company steal words like Meta, Face & Book, Threads, etc. and act as if that was their invention.

        But yeah I just kept using threadiverse because I feel like everyone here understands exactly what it is and others use it too. If people wouldn’t I wouldn’t use it I guess :)

        Edit: gonna start shortening that to TV so I can just tell everyone “saw that on TV”

      • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gemini is both the Google AI and the network protocol, it seems clear which one you’re referring to depending on context

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    We had some issues with the term “Threadiverse” when Meta’s Threads was on the rise and in public discourse. And people started confusing this with what Mark Zuckerberg does. But I think that toned down substantially. I think Threadiverse is a good term, we might as well try again and see if the confusion is still there. And I mean it’s a super niche term anyways to talk about a certain corner of a niche itself. So I guess it’s often embedded in a context and that’d help as well. I’d go for it. And the threads are the identifying mark of this place, so it fits.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I get that. It’s like every political conspiracy is a “-gate”. But its a useful shorthand, and thats what the term needs.

      Every time I explain it to someone, I roll my eyes a little at those terms, but thats what it’s called… It sounds so marketing. Trying to tell someone “join the Fediverse” feels like selling a cult, a little, lol

      I may ask my wife if she’ll let me set up something for her to scroll other than TikTok, though. She’s not the type to dive into new stuff like this without good reason, but if I just go “here’s your app, all set up with stuff you’ll generally enjoy!” maybe it’ll drag her off that godawful site.

      • julian@activitypub.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, although those terms are buzzwords only, not marketing speak. Like blogiverse, definitely not marketing.

        The marketing term the Social Web Foundation wants to put forward is “Open Social Web”, but that encompasses more than the threaded softwares (includes Mastodon, Peertube, etc.)

  • Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.frM
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I prefer forumverse. Or more inventive : Verse

    On !fediverse@piefed.social i created flair to categorize :

    • forum software : threadiverse
    • media software as pixelfed, peertube, vernissage : mediaverse
    • blog : fediblog …

    But i think it is confusing and do not help a lot 🥹

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just say lemmy for all that zone, but happy to switch. Threadi huh. Bit awkward but I’m sure we’ll get used to it.