• PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Vance was recently on tv saying carr isn’t responsible because “look, Jimmy is still on tv, so what’d Carr do wrong?”, trying to sweep it under the rug.

      • ziggurat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They were not successful in their goal when breaking the law, so this argument is that therefor they are innocent

  • nothrone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    This just shows that the whole “muh, it is the corporations fault for the climate emergency, there is nothing I can do about it!” is a load of BS. You can vote with your wallet. Become anti-consumption.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I was trying to buy food that wasn’t covered in plastic. I don’t have an option. I have looked for butchers, bakers and general food items that sell without plastic wrapping and it just isn’t feasible.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s an incredibly naive and misinformed opinion you’ve got there. Most of the companies polluting are not businesses that members of the public buy services from. The vast majority of the largest polluters are business to business providers, Joe public can’t do anything about that.

      Just look up Monsanto, if we took them out the total pollution worldwide would probably drop by about 50% but they sell to farmers, so you might say well don’t buy from farmers that buy from Monsanto but the problem is all farmers buy from Monsanto, so there isn’t another option.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      It takes two to tango, they say. Corporations have a lot more wallet to vote with, as it were - but we are not powerless or blameless when we support them out of complacency.

  • JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    The total allegedly includes subscriptions to Disney+, Hulu and ESPN. That falloff reportedly marked a 436 percent increase over the usual churn rate for the service.

    So 317.000 users would have cancelled anyway and the actual protest was 1.3 million. If my googling is right, in total there are ~207 million subscribers.

    Summarizing, they lost the 0,6%. Much more that what I expected, but hardly noticeable. I’d love to know how many already subscribed back.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nice. None of those “go woke go broke” boycotts ever actually materialize into meaningful business pressure.

    Unless you’re fucking Cracker Barrel.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Cracker Barrel is so far in the red that the logo redesign was a hail mary move. They couldn’t afford to lose the tiny number of people who still frequent their trash diners.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unless you’re fucking Cracker Barrel.

      Which was manufactured outrage, spawned by a few Shitter posts which were then amplified by a huge bot network.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      lol they are already on another “cracker barrel trend” right now, about a music performer making maga mad. also CB situation was fueled mostly by a certain propaganda source.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most CEOs are generally bright enough to look at the sales data rather than all of the online rhetoric and if the sales data isn’t going down they can ignore everything else.

      Everyone knows the right are terrible at organising themselves, they need a central figure in lieu of that they never achieve anything. When they try and boycott something it generally fails because most of them will continue to use the service while declaring loudly online that their not. The right don’t have actual moral values, other than selfishness.

  • KiloGex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    And then they raised the price, so anyone who goes back sheet this is punished for leaving in the first place. Screw Disney.

  • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    It may seem like a small percentage loss when talking dollar for dollar subscription loss vs Disneys massive revenue, but the scarier thing for their board of directors is damage to their brand.

    The thought that a situation like this could cause any long a lasting or irreparable harm to the iconic mouse ears in any way would make keep them awake at night.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Streaming services are very sensitive to the ups and downs of anything that’s a standard deviation of from normal. They’re too new to have 10+ years of data to fall back on, so the same overreactions that canceled Kimmel also uncanceled him because of panicky reactions to repercussions.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Disney has been trying to keep thier streaming alive, despite the massive costs maintaining one(paying all those actors and studios it aint cheap) which is why you see declining quality in the shows and movies.

      • Jourei@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think this is how boycotts are supposed to be. Protest and return if it’s successful.

        If companies know they won’t ever recover from the mistake, why walk it back?

  • gary@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Almost everyone I know who cancelled their subscription is happily renewing it now that Kimmel is back on the air. I’m sticking with donating to PBS every month instead.

    • teejay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      We’re not. We were halfway out the door already with the lack of good content and increasing prices. This just gave us a needed push to actually cancel. We won’t resubscribe.

      • gary@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s how I feel about it too. Literally nothing I wanted to watch over there anyway. I’m not missing anything.