Cryptobros gonna cryptobro

  • @rysiekOP
    link
    12 years ago

    Greed is a problem. Debt is a problem. Money… is a tool. One that enables them, but one that is also somewhat useful. As long as it’s not an end in and of itself (which is, incidentally, exactly what capitalism is about, and exactly what cryptocurrencies are about, and that is exactly why I said cryptocurrencies are intrinsically capitalist).

    Graeber’s analysis is fascinating. In small communities (say, a village) until, say ~18th century, money was simply not needed for day-to-day stuff. In fact, it was notoriously difficult to get coins in large enough quantity to go about regular daily business (buying food, selling your wares, etc).

    So people did what they always do in small, closely-knit communities: operated on credit. And in many of those communities every now and then (maybe once per year or six months, depending on the community) there was a reckoning, where people’s credit was cleared against each other, and what was left to pay was paid in coin.

    Actual money was used when a given transaction was happening with someone who was not from that community — a traveler, for example — as it was impossible to expect them to come to the reckoning or otherwise be around long enough to “balance the books” so to speak.

    It’s all sorts of more nuanced, of course, and Graeber goes into all that nuance. Really good read, and very much on-topic.

    Anyway, can’t wait for our friend to pontificate on how all of this is wrong and never happened and how Graeber — having done decades of scientific research both as an anthropologist and as an economist — has no clue what he’s talking about. 🙂

    • overflow
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      an economist who doesn’t even understand the difference between mainstream and austrian economists, how what was possible in the 18th century for tight-knit communities is not possible for modern day nation states and how even a left wing website admits that this is less an economics book and more propaganda

      • @rysiekOP
        link
        02 years ago

        an economist who doesn’t even understand the difference between mainstream and austrian economists

        You forgot your monocle emojo. Here, take mine: 🧐

        • overflow
          link
          fedilink
          -22 years ago

          if you’re an economist I don’t think it’s that farfetched that you should know the beliefs of the most dominant school of economic thought especially considering your whole thing is criticizing them and any introductory material in the field would introduce you to their beliefs.

          • @rysiekOP
            link
            02 years ago

            I think it’s far fetched to assume, especially without having read any of his works, that Graeber doesn’t know Austrian economics. 🤣

            • overflow
              link
              fedilink
              -12 years ago

              he gives ludwig von mises as an example of a mainstream economist so yeah it’s clear he doesn’t