• brianary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Transportability is a huge consideration. Pawpaws can’t be transported nationally, for example. The plants we eat have been bred for maximum marketability, which includes getting the produce from where it grows to where people need it.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Exactly. Instead of complaining people can just grow them themselves. It’s not like commercial growers have a monopoly on growing food.

      Otherwise this is a typical lemmy complaint. Someone who isn’t me didn’t do a thing I like. That makes someone else besides me bad. If there are things you want to exist in this world then you have to do things. This realization is real adulthood.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I live in a subtropical climate and it seems like most typical garden plants are not really good for our weather, it’s too hot for some and too wet for many who like hot.

    Our winners are:

    Trees- starfruit, longan, mango, papaya all do well.

    Garden -

    summer, wet season - Okra mostly. Hong Tsoi, Eggplant (little ones) Watermelon (little ones) sweet potato (Stokes Purple), tomatoes, basil.

    winter, dry season- Collards, peppers, broccoli (Green Magic) cauliflower, arugula, fennel, lettuce, radishes. Cilantro, or dill. A lot of the typical northern summer plants can be started in December or January to grow in the “spring” that runs from January to April ish.

    In between - peppers, fennel, mustard greens, eggplant, pumpkin type squash (but bugs always eat it) tomatoes.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So… cool story

    Ann Reardon from How to Cook That, took Coke, and tested it for HFCS, it of course indicated it was in there, then she took a Mexican Coke, and it also indicated, but it claims not to use it.

    Apparently, the acid in the Coke breaks down the sucrose in the cane sugar, making the product very close to the HFCS variant. She followed up with a blind taste test (very limited size, just her family) and found they were very close in flavor.

    It would appear that we do to some decent extent enjoy HFCS.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajVWRx8vsjE

      • harc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Oh boy are you in for a surprise…

        There’s his “Sex in the great (grand?) forrest”. Its about best plants to fuck on (or under). Mostly. As side notes it does point out some local plants in particularly interesting shapes, or some one might rub themself against… This guy is commited. And also an actual true professor on an actual university.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    alot of tropical ones tend to be poisonous too, because so much diversity of insects, trying to eat them develop toxins in thier parts. also some plants have to super poisonous because insects evolve to build resistance them, so plants have to respond by becoming more toxic. thats why poisonous plants are kinda invasive.

    yes english ivy is poisonous(berries) to non-avians.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Every September, I make a year’s supply of beautyberry jelly.

    I do something that I don’t recommend people do: I can it. I’m like 5 years in, and I haven’t had a problem yet. There’s a series of pages in my Ball canning recipe book that the beautyberry jelly recipe I use conforms pretty close to, but it isn’t USDA approved or otherwise published by some authority as safe for canning, I’m going to recommend you avoid this.

    Beautyberries, if you’re not familiar with them, are a bush/shrub native to the American southeast. The plant looks like a bunch of stems with leaves that grow along them, along with clusters of tiny white flowers in the spring at the base of each pair of leaves, that turn into vivid purple berries in the fall. The leaves can be used as a mosquito repellent if rubbed on clothing, and the berries are edible…although they’re bitter and astringent. Boiling them in water to make an extract and making jelly from that extract results in a bright red jelly that tastes like strawberry and tea.

    It’s something of a pain to harvest, so it pretty much isn’t commercially done.

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Everything I’ve seen from Ball/Kerr has been safe canning recipes! Love their stuff, use their website for recipes often.

      Oh I’ve misread. You picked a berry close to it and are substituting that in, yeah? I’d try it on myself but probably wouldn’t give it away.

      Sounds like a beautiful jelly though!

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes, I have Ball’s Complete Book Of Home Preserving (which is a terrible title, as the book contains no information about dehydrating, freeze drying, jerking or brewing, only water bath and pressure canning). It has a procedure for “berry” jelly where it lists half a dozen different kinds of berries and how to extract juice from them, to include elderberry, and then you use a quantity of said “berry” juice in a standard jelly recipe. Independent of this, I’ve found a beautyberry jelly recipe that resembles this procedure, so I feel okay canning it, and have done so for years now. I’m going to stop short of recommending it to anyone else. By all means, if you’ve got access to beautyberries, make the jelly, but can it at your own risk.

        • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          No beautyberries here! Tons of wild grapes though. Horrible producers those are though. All vine and no grapes!

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I hate to bring race and racism into this, but one reason why I laugh at many racists, especially European racists, is how they claim they love their own national culture but do jack shit to have ANYTHING to do with its pre-colonial cuisine. Take British cuisine for example. While obviously people in medieval England (even the richest people at the time) had far fewer options than most people in the UK today, but they still used many herbs and plants for seasonings that are only being rediscovered by reenactors in recent years, and they are actually quite good.

    More than just culture, the dangers of over-reliance on a handful of crops and cultivars is also dangerous. The Irish potato famine happened in the 1840s due to Irish potato corps just being a few kinds instead of the hundreds of varieties that you would find in South America. The result of this is that a blight that would have had a negligible effect in South America absolutely devastated Ireland. More recently in the 20th century, we have a near complete destruction of the Gros Michel banana in the 1950s. When you go to your typical supermarket, the bananas you see there are more than likely going to be Cavendish Bananas, which were considered inferior to Gros Michel in the past, but due to disease rendering Gros Michel bananas commercially nonviable they were chosen because they were all we got…

    and the same shit could happen at any time to the Cavendish banana, too.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I have to correct you on your terrible misunderstanding of the Irish Genocide. Your misinformation is almost certainly not your fault, as I was uncritically taught the same utter bullshit in my primary school curriculum in the USA. The Irish genocide that you refer to as using the colonizer’s term “Irish Potato Famine” had absolutely fuckall to do with potatoes or the Irish. The absent landlords in England extracted mandatory “tax” in the form of literally every food crop that the Irish slavestenants grew. There was ALWAYS, literally at ALL POINTS IN TIME, enough food to feed the people of Ireland. The food was physically stolen with violence and exported to cover “rent” to English “landlords” that never set foot in the country. Potatoes were grown in an act of extreme desperation as they were not a crop that was considered thefttax-worthy and therefore the Irish did their best to feed themselves.

      Think critically about it for like one second. Do you really believe that it was just a bunch of silly dumb Irishmen that only ever thought to grow literally a single crop for all of their food? In such a lush and nutrient rich area that is still famous for like a dozen high quality staples in different food groups? Or did you just get duped by racists that still spread their bullshit successfully?

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The Irish genocide that you refer to as using the colonizer’s term “Irish Potato Famine” had absolutely fuckall to do with potatoes or the Irish.

        But it has everything to do with potatoes (a particular blight that affected potato crops) and the Irish (the actual affected people of this genocide).

        The social and political reasons for why the Irish ended up so dependent on a single crop for sustenance is part of the story, of course, but this discussion right here is about the fragility and brittleness of relying on a single crop.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          But they were growing other successful crops. The English just stole it all from them.

          • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            You’re just listing reasons why they were reliant on a single crop for sustenance. Cool, but the actual historical example shows why that particular arrangement is brittle and vulnerable to shocks, which is the point being made here.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I am aware that the Irish famine was very multi-faceted and was an act of genocide. But for the sake of this particular argument (diversity in crops) I did point out that much of the Irish potato crop was a mono-culture, and the British absolutely brought over the blight without any concern of what it might do.

      • delgato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I understand where your anger is coming from but it’s misplaced. Lots of people, Americans too, learn the Irish genocide as “the Irish Potato Famine”. Secondly, single crop use is ONE factor that made the situation worse in the context of anti-Irish policies by the occupying British.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The simple fact of the matter is that there was enough food to feed every Irish mouth, and even available aid from other places. Anyone starving was a matter of policy.

    • okmko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I heard recently that Gros Michel can be ordered online for an arm and a leg. I’ve always wanted to try it.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They are still available,but can no longer be grown to the same scale. If you try one, tell me, I am curious as to how they taste.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It isn’t common in the US, but I was lucky enough to grow up with it as a staple in my dad’s garden. Funny thing, our family referred to it by its Polish name, so I didn’t know the English word for it until I was a teenager.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is dumb. Most plants resist cultivation. Bragging about being able to afford them does not make you Superior.

    Also yields are important

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Our current style of industrialized agriculture isn’t viable long-term (meaning: millenia); too much damage to the ecosystem.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Resist cultivation or have some other undesirable properties. Often low yield, short harvest, low yield, difficult picking or transporting.

      A favorite example of mine: oak’s acorns are sometimes edible. Roughly one in ten oaks produce edible acorns. They are indistinguishable from inedible ones unless you try them out - but inedible ones are fairly poisonous. The gene for edible acorns is recessive and it takes at least a decade before you know if a newly planted oak produces edible acorns or not, with a 10% probability of the former. It is just practically impossible to select for this criterion. Thus, we don’t eat acorns.

      • danekrae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Often low yield, short harvest, low yield, difficult picking or transporting.

        And let’s not forget, low yield.

        • Eq0@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 day ago

          Let us not!

          Low yield due to overly specific conditions that are hardly met

          Low yield due to short production window

          Low yield due to long growth time

          Low yield just because

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You just remove the tannins by soaking them, it’s not really a major problem. I tried it before, they were fine but fairly bland.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Isn’t acorn flour edible after you rinse out the toxins? Some north american tribes did essentially “farm” acorns (They managed groves of oak) and iirc that’s how they dealt with the toxicity.

      • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Acorns are like the easiest thing to forage, though. I agree that foraging isn’t as simple for many people as the OP makes it out to be, but acorns are a bad counter example.

        They are high in tannins, which your body is pretty good at processing in reasonable quantities (they’re in tea, coffee, and wine), but many acorns DO have unreasonable quantities of them and they can cause organ damage. Luckily, tannins are water soluble, so you just need to crack them open and soak them in water for a few days, then rinse and they’re safe to eat.

      • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I thought we eat acorns after processing them? There are cuisines which involve acorns as main ingredient.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Let the deer and squirrels and wild pigs eat the acorns, then eat the deer and squirrels and wild pigs. Easy!

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, I think that goes back to the whole “industrial farming” point. If it can’t be farmed, it won’t be commercially available. But there are plenty of plants that you could scavenge, if you knew what to look for.

      One of my personal favorite niche plants is osha root. It’s one of the best cures for a sore throat. It tastes a little bit like dirty root beer, and it’ll numb your entire throat when you chew on it. Native Americans kept some around for medicine. You can even grind it up and smear it on shallow scrapes to numb the area. You can find it in teas like Throat Coat, which is a sort of secret weapon for performers and public speakers whenever they have a sore throat.

      But it can’t be commercially farmed, because it exclusively grows in the Rocky Mountains where a specific type of fungus helps it thrive. It isn’t commercially viable to market to the masses like throat lozenges, (even though it is just as effective in reducing sore throats) because it has to be scavenged.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If it can’t be farmed there cannot be enough for everyone, but it will be exclusive to a select few. How they are selected is irrelevant.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My point wasn’t that commercial farming is bad. With 8 billion people on the planet, it’s a necessity. My point was simply that scavenging to supplant your needs should be more encouraged, and the knowledge should be passed down.

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Most people live in large cities where this is not feasible for everyone at once. Also transportation is expensive.

            • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              If you have a garden (I recommend far from the street to avoid pollution), some wild plants will grow in it. It’s good to know which ones you can eat and to be able to distinguish them from poisonnous ones. This way, weeding can become a sort of harvest.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        there are plenty of plants that you could scavenge

        But what happens when “you” becomes a million people? A hundred million people? A billion people? Where I live, we can’t even have a nice field of flowers because a hundred Instagram models will trample and ruin it before spring is over. Scavenging and foraging literally cannot feed the 7 billion human mouths on this planet.

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the point is it doesn’t prevent wide spread use. If a plant resists cultivation then it’s not worth it to try to farm, either industrially or in your back yard. Especially if you’re trying to farm for sustenance.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I love seeing the explosion of interest in pawpaws over the last decade. They’re very good, a bit of a cross between mango and a banana. I’ve actually seen them at a local fsrmers market this season, I was pretty surprised.

  • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok I’ll bite (literally), how does a person break into this niche, since it is definitely not a market? My engineering degrees did not heavily cover edible plants in my area? I can go find morel mushrooms and identify sassafras but that about covers it.

    If I could buy like a ring of +4 to local botany that would be best I think.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For me, it helped expand my cosmos by leaving things out and looking for alternatives.
      Like, I found out about a world of legumes by going vegan. And earlier this year, I stopped eating wheat for health reasons, and only then started to appreciate the existence of millet, quinoa, amaranth, buckwheat etc…

      I am probably still within the range of “usual” foods, all things considered, but at least I’m breaking out of a tiny subset of those…

    • Screamium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      On android you can use an app called “PlantNet” to take a picture of a plant and find out what it is. I’ve learned about many of the plants growing around me this way and have found new edible things. Garlic mustard is a good example. It’s invasive but edible and pretty good, so eating it is also protecting local ecology.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Please do not consume plants based on a visual ID by a convolutional neural network. It’s a dangerous and fundamentally flawed approach. Many plants can only be properly identified by observing specific parts that don’t turn out from a single angle photo, such as formations on the underside of leaves, or a specific curl direction of a flower stamen etc. etc.

        • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The app allows you to take several photos, label those parts (“leaves”, “flower”, etc.), and then you get several results, sorted by correspondence according to the neural network. When you click on a result, you get photos of different parts of the plant, allowing you to compare to your plant and judge if they’re the same.

          • pseudo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            In now this app and I use it but I agree with the previous comment. PlantNet should be an aid. One among many clue helping you getting the ability to recognis on your own which plant it is. Then we you don’t need PlantNet to recognise the plant 200 % and to say “It can only be this plant because of Z, of Y and also of X”, only then you should eat it.

            Otherwise, your playing with fire. That is your health and potentially your life.

        • Screamium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well, yeah if you want to eat something you want to be sure. Even if you only take one photo, you can look at pictures of the leaves, flowers, and fruit. There’s a link to other sources, like Wikipedia, where you can get more info.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Chanterelles and at least some species of Leccinum are pretty good too.

      Look into local berries. Maybe something is edible.

      Best is to find people who live off the land and still remember what their forefathers taught them about edible plants or mushrooms. If you’re in the US and have a reservation nearby, maybe they keep the old wisdom alive? Idk I’m not American, the only thing I got off a native American was weed.

      In countries where there are people dedicated to keeping tradition alive, it’s easier to find someone to ask I think. Here in Estonia a lot of people collect mushrooms and shit, so a lot of passionate people to ask about their hobby.

  • Remy Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is a very timely meme for me. Specifically because today, after many years of trial and error, I have finally managed to successfully cook Phaseolus polystachios beans!

    Mine are natirally very bitter and tough, not sure how widely that varies from specimen to specimen. Also presumably chock full of toxins/anti-nutrients… I’ve been taking the bitterness as an analogue for how much of that remains, for lack of any other other way to tell.

    Today, for the first time, I’ve managed to make them tender and not bitter at all. They taste pretty good!

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Eat your weeds… This is Common Purslane:

    It grows mostly everywhere and is a huge source of Omega 3 fatty acids. It’s much better cooked in my opinion. Also it’s best to find them in a field and not by the roadside where it may be leeching up god knows what hydrocarbon adjacent type of poisons.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Omg people can eat these??? My horse goes absolutely crazy for these things

      Now I gotta try some and see what all the fuss is about

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think I have these in my yard. The ones I have grow along the ground like vines almost, strong stems and such. I’ll have to check when I get home but thats really cool, thanks for sharing!

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There are fairly similar plants, so make sure to do your research. I get similar plants each year in my garden but I know they’re not purslane.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      probably dont eat ones growing on the streets. dandelions are cultivated, its a regular in some asian dishes. just not the street weeds.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Samsung’s pre-installed camera apps do that by default, I believe, unless you spot it and go digging where to turn it off (which seems do differ between some models, if I recall correctly)

  • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Can’t have biodiversity when you’re packing people to live in these rabbit hutchesbig cities ‘to save the planet’ as they say.

    You need that factory farmed samey shit because without it you wouldn’t have the ability to feed the people living in these sad places.

    You know who enjoys biodiversity? Rural people who have access to their own garden to grow stuff :3 (capitalists hate this trick)

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So unbelievably wrong. And don’t get me wrong I fully admire real rural farmers, the ones who make our food.

      Fake rural/suburbanites though are horrible for our planet and ecosystem. I’m from the Midwest where we have perfect soil for growing. What do they do? Pave over it, create stripmalls, big box stores, single family homes, every step of the way ruining the soil and area so we can’t farm there again for hundreds of years. Meanwhile runoff from pavement and parking lots pollutes that soil, they plant non-natural lawns that take more water and ruin biodiversity. None of that adds to our food or biodiversity, it may make them feel like they are, but it is quite literally doing the opposite.

      You want to be mad at city people? The people who are happy to have apartments who build up rather than our, trying to use as little space as possible? We use less electricity because we have less space. We require less heating. Less driving and polluting because we’re closer together.

      It may look worse, but my current city has the same population as the entire state where I grew up in, except people don’t selfishly each need an acre of perfectly farmable land to themselves. What we do in our footprint of a city “rural” people sprawl out for hundreds of square miles. No, I say fake rural people are much, much worse for the environment.

      • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s true you don’t own a selfish acre of perfectly farmable land instead you only survive because someone else is feeding you factory farmed, pesticide flavored, expensive monoculture food from their own acres moved into the city by the truckload :D so much better for the planet I agree :D :D

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You keep making assumptions about people, none of what you have said is based in anything. You assume urban people don’t have access to “real” food, when I have farmers markets weekly where independent farmers come into the city and sell their crops. We also have organic co-ops near us, and we have the ability to choose where we shop when we do from several different stores, choosing where to choose our produce. On top of that I do have spac to have a tiny garden where I live, so you can just stop assuming things about us City folk. You really think we must eat Soylent green or something?

          When I lived in rural America there was a single grocery store, there was no competition. I would argue I have more choice to eat what I prefer in the city vs in th country. So what you said could only be true only if you never go to a grocery store and you only grow everything yourself.

          And even then, remember I grew up in the Midwest. Where did you get your seeds?. More than likely you are growing genetically altered crops at home, and they come from some some large corporation. You want to judge us? You don’t even know what it’s like to live in a city.

  • Montagge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    I harvest stinging nettle to use as a spinach replacement

    I’m going to try to make maple syrup from big leaf maples this year too!

    • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mostly eat spinach now for potassium, but I just looked it up and stinging needle has only 25% lower potassium content than spinach, so at least for my use case it seems like a fairly good substitute seeing as how well stinging needle grow.

    • Vathsade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      How do they taste? Do they not, uh, sting with the little spikes?

      I got then popping up all around.

      • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        How to harvest, dry, and make tea with nettles:

        https://slrpnk.net/comment/16978019

        If you have arthritis or hayfever they’ve been shown to help with that. Science has confirmed the old wives tales traditional herbal remedy works for this one. Not as effectively as modern medicine of course but if it’s all you can afford, or whatever, then something is better than nothing.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You would harvest the leaves when they are small and young. And they would be one of the first fresh greens available in the spring. But their season quickly passes as the plants grow pretty fast.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you cook them they stop stinging.

        My mother makes pasta with them too, puts them in the dough.