• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Employers controlling their workers “time off” is old fashioned dystopia.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      118
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s entirely voluntarily (hence bonus), and has huge benefits for your self. I fail to see what the problem is.

      My company does the same thing, and so do many others.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        94
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your company is abusing it’s employees. Imagine if it was something other than exercise how abusive it would be.

        With how a lot of jobs have a lot of their pay based on nearly mandatory bonuses, this is basing pay on controlling you outside of work.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          44
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your company is abusing it’s employees. Imagine if it was something other than exercise how abusive it would be.

          Except it’s not, because it’s exclusively about health. It’s a discount health insurance companies offer to companies, and the company uses that money to encourage employees to be healthier.

          • beetus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your insurance benefit offered after health milestones isn’t 30-130% of your salary though

            Running 30km (18.6 miles) in a month earns a bonus equivalent to 30% of their monthly salary. Moving up to 40km (24.8 miles) pushes that to 40%. Hitting 50km (31 miles) earns 100%, and the top tier of 100km (62 miles) is 130%

          • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didnt see what was the appeal for companies until I realized they were US based companies and had to provide health insurance for their employees

          • mx_smith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Next up they will be forcing you to a plant based diet or maybe straight to veganism. Slippery slope towards forced sterilization or some other Radical procedure that saves them money but is not necessary.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As reported by Guangzhou Daily, Lin Zhiyong, the chairman of a company that makes paper for various devices, told his workers that their year-end bonuses had been canceled. Instead, the money will be distributed across each coming month, and how much employees receive will depend on how far they run.

        He literally canceled their bonuses and said “lol go run for it dipshit”

        Imagine getting your bonus cancelled and told to go do more work to get it back.

        Fuck this guy and fuck Chinese labour standards.

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t have to run. My lazy ass clears 6k steps each day just living life. That’s counts as walking, which is worth 1/3rd steps but still makes it a mile a day. I would be getting 100% bonus with literally no life change. Sign me up! Meanwhile, I never bonused working retail because people stealing carts crushed my EBITA every quarter.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are you a fucking idiot?

            Go work in a fucking Chinese paper factory all day for not enough money to live, and then go have part of your salary taken away and be told to do more work.

            Maybe after having a second of fucking realisation you won’t come back and spout such dumbarse nonsense.

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You obviously are a fucking idiot because a bonus isn’t your salary shithead. Also this is the most trivial nonsense I’ve ever heard of to bonus 100%. I live in America where I’ve never once gotten 100% of my goddammit bonus fuckface. Being told that you get all of it for wearing a pedometer is literal childs play to me. Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit baby agression and jerk off or something instead.

              I fucking wish I worked in a Chinese paper factory and got bonuses! Like seriously, get a goddammit clue. If that sounds like hard work to you, then you’ve literally never seen one, and you must have baby soft keyboard hands.

              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re an absolute moron.

                I too wish you get to work in a Chinese factory.

                • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m surprised you can even spell moron. I bet the reason you think it’s so bad is because you’re a piece of shit racist. Get over yourself.

                  Looks much nicer than my workplace. I also work with Chinese manufacturers and know how many holidays they get off too, so unlike you, I’m not actually ignorant to your average Chinese persons working environment and make believe its some hellscape. Our middle class is collapsing while theirs has grown substantially. Their government does some crazy shit but we’re no exception.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not all of these programs explicitly require running with no alternatives for people who can’t run.

          Most that I’ve seen are usually just based on “exercise minutes” depending on how your device tracks those. The Apple watch is really lenient and I get 50% of my daily goal just walking to work.

            • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m sure they offer alternatives. Not everything is so black and white.

              Our companies in particular is just 30 exercise minutes so you can do whatever you want to get your heart rate up.

              • Blooper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sex. I want my company to pay me to sex. I feel like I could totally get behind that. Sexually.

              • Brekky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I hope ‘going to therapy to treat your depression because you can’t force yourself to go out and exercise’ is offered as an alternative too.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the company is operating in good faith, they will be making “reasonable accommodations” for disabled workers.

              The top tier of this program requires about 30 minutes of running per day. I’m sure we can find a similarly intensive workout to meet the needs and capabilities of disabled workers, numbnuts.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they want to be a part of employees health and well-being they can pay health insurance or start the day with a hit sessions or yoga or tai chi.

        They absolutely shouldn’t be encouraging, through their bonus scheme, people to do work associated activities in their spare time.

        I understand your view I just don’t like that this is how they’ve chosen to encourage such a thing.

        My work has a marathon every year, during work hours on a voluntary basis and logs training miles for competition. Never affects earnings or personal time.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it is a transparent attempt to pay less bonuses and I am betting exploits some condition in the insurance and/or tax code to get a better deal for the corporation.

        How about companies just pay the end of the year bonus and not make a big deal about it?

            • toasteecup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not attempting to excuse the behavior by any means (no matter how much it sounds otherwise).

              Just explaining that this is behavior we can and should expect from an authoritarian state with no regard for human rights. Hopefully that clarifies things a little bit.

              • isles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, and reading the parent I see they were speaking of exploiting laws, not people specifically. Thanks for clarifying, hope you have a nice day

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or it’s because insurance companies offer discounts for companies that offer these programs. The employer uses some (or all) of that money to encourage employees to be healthier which A. makes them healthier. B. saves the insurance company/insurance money. C. helps boost productivity. and D. makes everyone overall happier.

      • aulin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bonuses should not be expected, or they’re not bonuses. I get that. But making them available only to those able to do some physical test is discrimination.

    • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My work is somehow promoting sport over lunch break (well there is always an Ass hole setting a meeting at 13) but it’s lunch break, not work time. However, during that time we build connections with other employees, talk about work, so basically free cross department team building for the company

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reading further, walking is only counted at a 0.3 : 1 ratio of distance, for no conceivable reason. So you can run for ~12 minutes or walk for ~1 hr, it seems.

      But why should my bonus be tied to something that is not at all related to my work? Should I get a pay cut if I eat a Dorito? Am I worthy enough of a pittance, CEO? Or should I be jumping through literal hoops?

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue isn’t whether it’s a healthy idea. The issue is that the employer is overstepping personal and professional boundaries.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is it overstepping? If the bonus criteria aren’t laid out in the compensation package at the time of hiring, it’s petty much whatever they want, provided they can find a suitable way to accommodate employees that would be at a disadvantage due to protected class.

        I wonder how they are ensuring the collected data is accurate.

        Edit: If it’s just a fitness app, then I’m crushing it on the daily just existing, and I am not a fit man. Hell, I’d be getting a 130% bonus.

        • Melllvar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely it is. Anything that is not related to my job performance is none of my employer’s business and should be off the table when it comes to determining compensation or bonuses.

          • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            The boss believes their employees’ fitness is a direct correlation to the success of the company, which makes it related to their job performance.

            I agree this is a strange belief to be held by an employer. The business gets to define the relevance, especially if they are gonna base so much of your compensation off of it.

            • Melllvar@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m sure there are lots of ways bosses might want their employees to change in their personal lives because it might benefit the company. But that’s the part that’s overstepping.

              • itsprobablyfine@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                What if you got a bonus for taking an external training? Still no? This seems like a weirdly hard line to draw fo a bonus

                • Melllvar@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Training in a job related field is actually related to job performance.

                  But it’s not really about the bonus. It’s about the boundaries. I see no problem with setting hard boundaries between personal life and work life.

          • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The overall health of a workforce affects health insurance rates and every employee. The more unhealthy a workforce is, the more money comes out of your check for insurance. This is why wellness programs exist at companies.

        • Melllvar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yet, the SJWs of America come out of the wood work to berate an idea of trying to move a little bit more and use “disabilities” as a shield to trying to do something that is healthy for

          I haven’t said anything about disabilities.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      First, disabled people exist.

      Second, the article makes it clear walking only counts for 30% credit.

      Third, if you are not doing it, starting can be very difficult.

      Fourth, the top bonus requires 62 miles per month.

      Last, why should there be a bonus based on something unrelated to your work?

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re not doing it getting a giant bonus would be a good motivator to go out

        One mile a day is really really easy to do. Jogging or walking. If you can’t do that then quite honestly you’re not in any sort of good shape.

        62 miles a month is slightly over a mile a day. If you’re not walking at least a mile a day you are doing your body a massive disservice

        Why not if this is both easy to do and a benefit for your own health?

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re not doing it getting a giant bonus would be a good motivator to go out

          A better motivator would be giving credit for improvements rather than requiring the same of all regardless of age, fitness level, and disability. The only thing this would motivate me to do is find another job.

          One mile a day is really really easy to do. Jogging or walking.

          Walking only counts for 0.3 of jogging, so it is 3.33 miles of walking

          My doctor has specifically advised against jogging due to the impact on my knees.

          62 miles a month is slightly over a mile a day.

          Math isn’t your strong suit, huh? That is over 2 miles a day, Or 6.67 miles if you walk.

          Why not if this is both easy to do and a benefit for your own health?

          You miss the point. It may be easy for you, but it is not easy for everyone.

        • dasgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ‘Prevents you from moving’

          Buddy I can walk just fine but if you ask my hypermobile and asthmatic ass to run, I’m just not going to. I can’t. My legs and lungs are fucked up. Guess I don’t get the extra bonus, oh well. Sucks.

          If you’re heavy, running can be a real challenge. ‘Promoting fitness’ isn’t done through a braindead scheme like this. Not for people who need guidance and help to get into a body shape they can be happy and healthy in.

          You know who will get the extra bonus? Healthy people who are able to run, and who have no health conditions to begin with.

          You are really, really underestimating the range of disabilities people can have while they can still function at their jobs. And how this braindead scheme excludes people for things outside of their control.

          And also, ‘not be a slob’. Am I a slob because I can’t just run a mile? You take my legs that bend like a silly straw and my lungs that collapse in on themselves and feel like they’re filled with cat litter that is on fire, and see if you run a mile.

          Jfc calling us slobs. Go fuck yourself.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. Lmao NO. Disabled people work. We have this whole law about it and everything in the United States where employers have to provide reasonable accommodations and allow you time off work without compromising your job status.

          I’m disabled. I work full time. I could not fulfill these exercise requirements, but I can hold down a job. That is not a rare category of human being.

          We should have universal healthcare, not this nonsense from a private employer.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you have a condition that prevents you from moving/ elevated heart rate, chances are you not working and already on disability.

          Ah, no. Plenty of us work. Desk jobs exist. I sit at one now. I have been told by my doctor I should not jog or run due to the impact to my knees.

          I understand the article says this but how do you police it. Put your fitness tracker to “Outdoor run” and call it day. Unless there are stricter measurements around heart rate and minimum speeds I don’t fully buy this.

          So you don’t know how they police it, but 1 sentence later you see how easy it is to police.

          So start. If a company is going to incentivize you to not be a slob maybe just go do it. Life isn’t fair. Stop making excuses and be a better version of yourself.

          Ah, the old “life isn’t fair” copout. Why should we not do our best to be fair?

          Idk, maybe they want their employees to not die of heart failure at 40 and see them grow to be old and successful.

          Ah, yes, because there is no daylight between the binary options of heart failure at 40 and growing old.

            • derf82@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Clearly. I said likely, not “all”. Likely assumes situations in which that is not true which in this case is the exact thing you said. Thank you for reiterating.

              You still have it wrong. You can’t just show up and easily get disability benefits. And that statement still reinforces the lie that the disabled are lazy, when the disabled want to work. And that is only people that meet the definition of disabled. There are surely more people with physical limitations that don’t otherwise qualify as “disabled”.

              No where do they talk about this.

              They specifically say walking only gets 1:0.3 credit. How can you assume that is unpoliced when it is a specific policy? The logical assumption is that is IS policed since they took the time to give lesser credit to walking.

              Life isn’t fair. It’s not a cop out. Exceptions can and need to be made.

              And they have no exceptions. That is the point.

              So let’s just prevent all people in society from healthy activities because it discriminates. Let’s drag all of society down to the same playing field for fairness. Solid reasoning. You know what’s easier reasoning to reconcile. Exceptions to the rule.

              What a straw man. No one is preventing people from healthy activities.

    • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And research has proven walking those 20 minutes is a very beneficial for your health

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    My health is nearly none of my employer’s business. I will not be telling them when or how I exercise.

    This is a gross invasion of privacy.

    There isn’t much difference between a “bonus” and a penalty, given enough notice.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kind of like the Japanese culture of the workplace being in charge of the health of their workers. This is why they all exercise for the first 30 min of their shift. If they are overweight, they find a solution.

      Is it invasive? Kind of, yeah. Pretty much. Idk. Maybe the bonus shouldn’t ride on the fitness, but I think the workplaces should be more involved in the health of their employees.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Japan has a fraction of the obesity as the USA.(BMI >/=30, J%:3.8M/3.2F to USA%:43.0M/41.9F)

        Also they have 1/3rd the % of population with disabilities at 4.3% vs the USA with 13%.

        I’m not saying the brief forced workout routine by their employers has results, by no means, what I am getting at is that shit wouldn’t fly in America and any attempt would end in failure due to our cultural relationship with food.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair it is kind of their business just in a very indirect and invasive way.

      Your health affects your performance, your health affects their health insurance, disability, and life insurance premiums.

      This means that as far as the faceless entity of a business goes your health is its concern. Now whether we agree to just accept that or not as a whole other story.

      On a personal level I wouldn’t mind my employer being more involved in my health, not invasively or privacy violating like the above. Providing access to nutritionists or trainers, supplementing a gym membership under the agreement that I actually use it. Making exercise equipment and group workout sessions available. Things like that.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        “firm in China”. Pretty sure China doesn’t deal with “health insurance, disability, and life insurance premiums.”

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            Single payer would be cheaper than the current system. Other countries pay half of what the US does per capita to insure everyone and they have better outcomes because people get care when they need it.

            Idiots like you are why we can’t fix our system because you blame other people instead of the for profit corporations that lobby to keep any kind of progress from happening so they can continue sucking money out of the system.

            • SaucySnake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who says I’m against single payer healthcare? I was just continuing the joke about lard-ass coworkers. No matter what the healthcare system is a healthier population results in less crowded hospitals and better access to those who need it.

            • galloog1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Idiots like them suddenly have a reason to get involved in your life for all the reasons above. Suddenly you are in discussions regarding tobacco and other drugs costing everyone money. You don’t exercise? That means you are less of a citizen. This is very much why this would not be a good federal program.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          100% it shouldn’t but that’s not the point here, and doesn’t actually change anything about the topic at hand.

          The unfortunate reality is that our healthcare is tied to our employment. This also means the side effects of that unfortunate reality are also real.

          Not that I’m agreeing with the way things are I’m simply explaining that the way things are means that such argument doesn’t discount the fax or serve as any sort of counter.

      • kase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        lardass

        Y’know, something tells me you’re just saying this bc you hate fat people.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unless the company is going to allow me to run in company time or pay me my base pay plus overtime on top of the bonus that’s a hard fuck no from me.

    Company wants my time, they better damn well pay for it.

    ETA. Thinking about it more, nah this whole running for your bonus is bullshit and I wouldn’t do it even if they paid me overtime since running/exercising unless your job is directly related to it, running has nothing to do with work performance which the bonus is based on.

    • xarexyouxmadx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they are paying you for it. Not for your time specifically but for your distance. Idk if you read the article but highest tier is 130% of your base salary.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No they are not. A bonus is for your performance at work and when I run it’s on my own damn time.

        IDGAF how much of a bonus it is, 30% is all fine and dandy but again, if they aren’t letting employees run on company time or paying employees for the time while they run during their off hours, then it’s still a fuck no from me and it’s complete bullshit to base a performance based bonus on you doing shit on your off time.

        But hey, if you like having your company keeping tabs on how much you run vs how well you actually do at work for your bonus, I guess good for you, just not my cup of tea.

          • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Again, no because a bonus is based on your performance at work, how you coworkers performed, how you all performed together at work and unless your work was directly related to you and your team running and even then you’d be running on company time.

            A person running has fuck all to do with performance at work and thinking about it more especially more with the various people I have and do work with, I find myself thinking how this really is an assinine idea that is not only a overstep into community script territory but also could be a very shitty thing for employee morale.

            • CoralMask146@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A bonus can be anything. Doesn’t necessarily have to be tied to your performance. It’s called a discretionary bonus

              My question assumes you get your normal performance-based bonus… But you get an additional bonus based on your walking

              Maybe it’s just me, but I find it mind-boggling that you wouldn’t do it. You’re getting paid to be healthy, essentially…

            • USAONE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll never understand why anyone enjoys running. I absolutely hate it and feel terrible after running. I ran every day for 22 years (former military) and hated every single day.

              I prefer rowing, that is actually fun.

              • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I personally love running because it’s a time where I can just let my mind wander, reflect, or just have it go blank.

                Plus it also helps when your half marathon path ended at the brewery where you have a tab.

                • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are other physical activities that people enjoy that do the same exact thing. Another person mentioned rowing, but riding a bicycle is also similar. The point is, not everyone likes running, even if they do like letting their mind wander.

                • Sandbag@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m sorry, the last two comments were immature and not representative of who I am. Don’t know what came over me, but it’s not the way to behave or act online or in person.

                  You don’t have to accept this apology but know I strive to be better than what this comment chain shows.

                  Again sorry.

          • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This screams I’m a complete moron that can’t understand or have a intellectual discussion over a topic so I’ll just do a dumbass ad hominem attack.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In theory.

        In practice, it has to be approved by your supervisor and is only for times when it won’t interfere with progress on actual work.

        So all they’ve gotta do is give you a lot of work to do…or just say no…and you don’t get that anymore.

        • USAONE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s never been an issue for us. People go before they come in or at the end of the day. We’re at a Air Force base so if be different at other installations.

            • turmacar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              No because it’s assumed you’ll use the golfcart. Spinning in chairs counts if you do it long enough to work up a sweat.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, that kind of makes sense. “Maintain battle readyness” and all that. I would expect everyone in the military, law enforcement, or emergency response should be paid also.

        Firefighter isn’t going to carry someone down a flight of stairs if they have that “Body By Dunkin’”

    • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would add: And bonuses are a BS excuse to overwork employees and making them work overtime for free. Having to go above and beyond simply to earn the end of year bonus caused me huge amounts of stress, anxiety, depression, and even affected my physical health.

      You know how I solved that problem? By quitting and moving to a better company.

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean being active anyway is a good thing for you And if the bonus is 30% of your monthly salary each month to do a bare minimum of movement that sounds like easy money

    • The Uncanny Observer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So just don’t take the bonus, then? Easy enough. Bonuses aren’t part of your normal wages. They’re given, not owed, not unless you do whatever they say you have to in order to earn them. So if you don’t feel like doing whatever it is that your company demands in order to receive the bonus, then just don’t do it and don’t get the money.

      You should probably run miles each month anyway so maybe you won’t die in your sixties from heart disease.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        "Oh hey, thanks to you and your team for working all that overtime these past few months to make sure the project was done on-time and turning this potential loss of a client around.

        However, we noticed that you and your team didn’t run enough during these months so we’re going to have to dock your bonus for the year but thanks for all of your hard work for the company."

        But yeah, just don’t take the bonus.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, what’s wrong with you and your stupid wheelchair? If you want a bonus, you should get up out of that wheelchair and start running on your stumps!

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Other than the disability, privacy and disability concerns already raised- Running is SO boring. What if you prefer other cardio activity or a mix of strength training and cardio? Why does it have to be running?

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also can’t see how this doesn’t open them up to lawsuits for any injuries incurred from a sprained ankle to a blown out knee or a heart attack. I’m a manager in a large company, and I got a bit nervous at some of the offsite activities, and those were mild things like dunk tanks. Plus I bet the entertainment company or venue carries that insurance. This is literally making the run part of the job, and it’s a relatively dangerous activity.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s in China… You might end up in a work camp for getting injured and speaking up about it.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You and most people in this thread are right but I’m sure that can’t be a concern in their legal framework, otherwise they wouldn’t have come up with the idea.

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know a number of companies that have introduced exercise programs. In every case it’s clearly done on the employee’s own time, is made accommodating, and the reward for completing your 4000 steps per day or whatever is a tee shirt or something. It’s not that these things can’t be done.

          Plus companies do stupid things that get them sued all the time. Look at Elon.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Running has always been where I was able to just let my mind wonder. It’s like meditating while exercising.

  • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount of bonus a worker gets is based on the number of miles they complete each month.

    I understand what they’re trying to do, but this is just not equitable. You’d have to figure out how to handle this for people who cannot run (such as wheelchair users). This greatly favours those with more free time and less obligations (such as people with no kids). It favours those already in shape and those who have fewer health issues.

    This will favour those who already have it better off, which is the opposite of equity.

    Good idea in theory, but I don’t like the model where it’s applied based on output.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the good part in theory? I can’t see how what/how much exercise, if a person chooses/is able to do it at all, is relevant to their job? Especially in a company that makes paper??

      If employers want their employees to be happier and healthier they need to pay them better (for their work, not for whatever unrelated and out of hours activity they decide to “reward”) and give them more time off, anything else is profit seeking bullshit.

  • Squeak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Run 2 miles/day to receive a bonus of 130% my salary? That seems insanely good value and this is coming from someone who has run about a total of 2 miles since I left school.

    Get the train to work and park just over a mile away, run to catch the train and go to work. After work run back to your car. Instant 130% salary increase

    • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless you’re disabled, elderly or otherwise unable to do this… Not to mention how is this tracked? I don’t want MY employer knowing what I do or where I go in my free time.

      • Squeak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, of course there needs to be exceptions for those less able.

        It’s tracked by a fitness app according to the article. Just turn off permissions once you’ve finished your run.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, of course there needs to be exceptions for those less able.

          So people would need to disclose their medical information to their employer now too, and also hope that they not only keep it private, but consider it at all, with all… none of their medical knowledge? Oh, sorry, only disabled people, you know, so that they can qualify for whatever “exceptions” to this discriminatory bullshit the boss comes up with…

        • Dalraz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only thing required is this to be made explicitly illegal.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my company they gave you a fitbit type device. The deal wasn’t as good. I think it was free HSA money or something.

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dystopia on top of dystopia. Need a special fund to not die when sick. Job makes you do extra. labor just to afford health care.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If someone wants to give me a nice Christmas present I’ll wear 2 watches. ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ♪

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because these employees needed these bonuses. They were essentially a normal part of their compensation. Now it’s being held hostage.

    • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the amount that get crazy, my work has some goodies/benefit for people who exercises, but it’s like a free T shirt once in a while, a charity event where they give 1€ per kilometer to charity, and negotiated discount for some activities. But a 30% or even more bonus?

      I know what to ask to HR

          • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Greatly, greatly, influenced by genetics. I’ve known people, hell I’ve dated people, who ate better and worked out more than I did, but were still fat af. Meanwhile I just do a little jog and basically can eat whatever I want.

            I’m not going to go and pretend I’m not fat because I’ve made smart choices.

            • nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah. It’s more about inherenting eating habits than genes. Also it’s much easier to gain weight if you’ve been obese during your youth. Eating is also an unhealthy coping mechanism for a lot of people. Genes is probably on fifth place if not lower.

              • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m a fatass now, but up until my 30s I was skinny, underweight even. I eat less (and better) now than I did then, so obviously there’s more to it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Michael Scott’s Dunder Mifflin Scranton Meredith Palmer Memorial Celebrity Rabies Awareness Pro-Am Fun Run Race For the Cure.

      That episode even had Kevin insisting he doesn’t want to run and Michael threatening to fire him.

      • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for saving me the search.

        Also, there was the one where they were testing their sprinting speed with the radar sign, and Michael claimed he was running at 30 mph because a car drove by while he was going.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    100km/mo = 3.33km/day or A little over 2 miles a day.

    Which sounds do-able if you’re fit and healthy. But what if you’re disabled or partially disabled?

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reality is you dont want to run every day. You can. But you should not for the sake of your joints.

      Realistically this should be 6-8kms, 3-4 times a week.

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fast walking is about 90% of the benefits of running with 10% the injury potential (casual assessment)

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can’t do 2 miles a day you are nowhere even close to the realm of a healthy person. Like not even within a 100 miles of healthy

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or disabled. I found out yesterday I get to go back into a total contact cast for a foot deformity. :( I currently can’t walk to the mailbox, forget about two miles.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some guy pushes himself too much, dies from a heart attack and they cancel the initiative

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At one previous company where I worked I started a karate dojo, and I gave voluntarily classes. About 40% of the company regularly trained with me and we all got ripped, it was awesome

  • SharkyPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of my previous jobs did something similar to this only without reward and public shaming as the punishment. We were all cube workers forced to do army standard tests and training after work.

  • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s actually not a bad idea. Their employees staying fit and healthy also helps then being more productive for the company long term. The employees themselves, also probably wouldn’t mind staying fit and healthy. Win/win.

    • braxy29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      is the insurance good enough to cover the cost of a knee and a hip for me? because that’s what i’m gonna need if they want me to take up running. at minimum.

      this is not a bonus available to employees who can’t take up running, for whatever reason.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m guessing China has far better insurance than the US and you don’t pay nearly as much for doctors or operations there

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve had several companies offer to partly cover the cost of a gym or exercise/weightliss/smoking cessation program. Similar idea but much better for covering health improvements for anyone. It’s also not presented as a bonus tied to job performance, but a benefit related to healthcare

      Unfortunately there’s that pesky qualification “partly”. In general I haven’t been incented because I still have to pay too much and the inconvenience of the paperwork just makes it … inconvenient

    • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In principle I see it, and I did used to have this opinion when I was younger. But as I’ve got older I’ve associated getting paid with working (for some odd reason) and the last thing I want to do is work on my relaxing evening jog, and think about how much money I can make.

      I would love it if an employer would let you take time off during the day to workout, though. There’s only so much you can work until a lunch break