• ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Far and away the 90s and it’s not even close. We had the internet but it wasn’t stalking us. We had cell phones but your parents couldn’t drop a tracker app on it to see if you were actually at Doug’s house. Gas was cheap. Airports were better, flying was better, fewer people, god I miss the 90s.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s an interesting idea, though, that one’s preference for a particular design or aesthetic, especially when that design or aesthetic is emblematic of a particular historical or cultural moment, is never wholly isolated to its visual or material components, but also innately tied to our memory and understanding of that moment. I personally don’t think you can extricate a particular aesthetic from the psychic background noise surrounding it. Our minds don’t work that way. It’s always forming these subconscious or unconscious connections, binding events and memory to abstract signifiers.

        We don’t like the 90s aesthetic because it’s “better” or even attractive. I mean, nobody has wallpaper in their home with those pastel and neon triangles. Many of us like it because it reminds us of childhood, of not having responsibilities other than waking up early enough on Saturday to catch all your cartoons and of not complaining too much when you have to go visit your grandparents who can never remember your birthday and who always ask you how old you are this year, of finishing Super Mario on the SNES before your friend does so you can brag about being better at video games than him. It’s of a simpler time and place, because we were simpler. And it was, in retrospect, of an America briefly sandwiched between the end of the original “Forever War” that was the Cold War, and the beginning of the 20th Century’s new “Forever War,” that is the War on Terror.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t forget about the banning of indoor smoking in public places. God the 90’s were a horrible time for that although it was winding down.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It wasn’t so great if you were gay, either. Racism was mostly passe, but everyone thought Columbus was a cool guy and the natives disappeared on their own, which is not ideal.

          Not being poor and the blissful delusion that history is over sound lit, but there are some hard edges to the era I hear about occasionally, as a Zoomer. And WTF is up with that song about rubbing your boner on people?

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        and real original movies. and tv shows with writing. and music videos. and exciting new progress in video games. and cheap live music. and thongs under low rise jeans.

    • satanmat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Then the 80s show up and takes your lunch money, by blinding you with our awesome fluorescent clothing

      Ha!

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That, and internet in the late 90s started to get really fast. Some blokes sat in their rooms for days on end, downloading music or movies, as there were no laws against it yet. Or at least they were not enforced. In other words, those were the days when average Joe could still be one step ahead of The Man. You know, before he turned against us with a vengeance, everywhere, 24/7.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Me, in my ivory tower: Man, bandages as an art style really seems to be trendy amongst the wastelanders. I wonder why?

      • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        This comment actually made that choice click in my head, I’d never asked why that was before and kinda assumed it was to help protect the internals of a machine you couldn’t fix from the environment but really it’s more likely to be so you always have some bandages on hand (however sanitary)

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          oh, I figured it was just the ideal binding material for broken parts (e.g. limbs, rifle butts) whilst providing comfort and stretch/tightness control.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Now I’m no apocalypse expert, but I feel like a knife taped to some rebar doesn’t make for a very viable arrow, or at least not one that the pictured bow could fire

      Edit: is that a curtain tassle they’ve used for fletching?

      • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m also unsure about the purpose of the blood-stained bandages that keep you from holding the sub-machinegun’s foregrip.
        Or whether the sharp, jagged edges on the frame of the goggles might be an issue.
        And what the fuck is the skull used for?

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can’t comment on the other things, but the skull is obvious - it’s for drinking, and the top half functions like a lid you can flap on and off, like a German beer stein.

  • SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Memphis design for the colors and patterns, Y2K for the colorful translucent electronics, and Frutiger Aero for the GUIs.

  • mydoomlessaccount@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m biased towards Y2K from the nostalgia, since those were the prime years of my childhood right before my teenage years kicked in.

    But, I love the design of that time because of how obsessed with futurism everything was. It took the future chic look of the mid-late '60s and revamped it, taking that hype for the future- with the Space Race- bringing it back, and updating it for the Information Age.

    It felt like we, as a society, had so much optimism for the world that was to come. So, if anything, I think that’s what I’m mostly nostalgic for. I was so excited to grow up in that world. Damn.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It felt like we, as a society, had so much optimism for the world that was to come. So, if anything, I think that’s what I’m mostly nostalgic for. I was so excited to grow up in that world. Damn.

      As with anything regarding the past, there’s a lot of rose-tinted glasses going on. Be careful what you wish for

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would also argue we lived in a pre-9/11 world.

        It us shocking how much the world changed in response for the sake of security and safety, and I know it’s a controversial take but the terrorists succeed in changing the world to their image.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Before: wow, this new thing is literally 4 times faster with a fuckload of features.

          After : wow, this new thing allows 800 companies, fifty countries and 2 superpowers to spy on me at the same time and has 4 times the bloatware!

          And all the alternatives do the same thing!

    • livus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Me too, on the design, what I like about it is it wasn’t the ultra clean look futurism of the 1980s it was sort of collided with grunge.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Honestly? Any of them except the last one. My preference would be 2005-2015, but any of them is better than what came after. Late 2010s was alright, but around 2020 you can really tell UI designers got their marching orders.

    It’s all so damn boring and lifeless. Rounded corners on literally everything for no reason other than trend chasing, wasted space and needless gaps between elements, white OR black - rarely anything else, lest it interfere with whatever systemwide adaptive coloring thing is running (even if there isn’t one), boring and lifeless icons/logos, an obsession with “clean” and “streamlined” that effectively equates to the removal of usability for aesthetics, etc. All of it copy and pasted to every single piece of software or app or site.

    Its ironic you put Corporate Memphis images next to it in the 2015-2024 section, because that is effectively what this trend in design aesthetic will be remembered as.

    Bland, lifeless, safe, focus-grouped garbage, implemented by companies that have reached a point where the innovation is dead, corporate consolidation has effectively destroyed any room for something new and original to enter the space, and the only thing they do anymore is trend chase. Even the slightest bit of originality or doing something different from the market leader may risk the potential loss of a sliver of shareholder profit, and that simply must never be done.

    And I swear to God, if I hear one more focus group generated argument about how rounded corners are more inviting or human, I am going to break into your home, and personally change every last single doorway into a hobbit hole, and every window into a port hole.

    • mercano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      The needless gaps are there for touchscreen optimization, even on things you never use a touchscreen on, like a desktop OS.

      • FireWire400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it’s to make desktop computing more approachable for people because smartphones are so ubiquitous nowadays and used by literally all age groups, so it makes a little bit of sense I guess.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Windows, pretty much the desktop OS still would like you to drag the screen up to start a login

        Dude, you detected a mouse and keyboard during setup

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Flat design is clinical depression in graphical form, a reflection of the contemporary existential/mental health crisis. It’s a societal cry for help, basically.

    • ɘlddoW .ᴙM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or smartphones and high pixel density displays became the norm, and raster graphics don’t look good or scale well on them. Simple vector graphics are crisper on your screen, can be rendered via things like CSS, and can more easily scale to different resolutions and dimensions.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Apple’s skeuomorphic phase overlapped the Retina display era, though, so I don’t buy that explanation. Also, it’s nothing to do with raster vs. vector. The photos that we take with phone cameras are raster graphics, for example. They look great, and it’s because they’re high-resolution. High-res raster UI elements would look great, except then the versatile manipulation by CSS would not be possible. Vector graphics are very good at that.

        But here’s the thing: Complex vector graphics exist, too. There were some pretty fancy PostScript graphics even back in the early 1990’s. With all the pixels that we have now, we could have good design instead of flat, if the developers bothered. But it seems we’ve internalized the feeling that we’re not worth the effort, aesthetics and color aren’t interesting, and life is a joyless slog. Which sounds and awful lot like clinical depression…

        (Incidentally, odd that emoji aren’t flat design.)

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seems more a rejects of the flamboyance of the prior two generation which will certainly give it a different feel. It absolutely felt fresh at the time of inception.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d be so happy for a desktop window manager that didn’t make all of the window borders grey-on-grey, and distinguish the active window by making the title text slightly-darker grey.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Judging by the comments I think I must be alone in loathing the Frutiger Aero style of design, both now and at the time. So self-conscious, so fake-looking, so plasticky.

    Much prefer the clean lines and flat colours of nowadays (although that’s not to say there aren’t issues - eg Google’s stupid icon design policies in the last few years)

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I actually really like Metro, live tiles are criminally underused and imo it gets a lot of hate becauae of how microsoft pushed it in windows 8, but for a touch interface it’s clean and really nice to use. Loved the sideways laid out apps too on windows phone and windows rt, wp itself was actually really nice to use and I actually kinda miss my lumia 1020

  • cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was born and raised throughout the whole Memphis Design era, reluctantly tolerated the Y2K era, gained a little hope for humanity during the Frutiger Aero era, then subsequently lost all hope once the Flat Design era hit.

  • fixmycode@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every era is defined by the tools we had at hand during that process. While Memphis is basically pixel art, Y2K was defined by the gradient and mask tools on Photoshop, and Aero was a victim of skewmorphic design trends pushed by the commodity of 3D tooling. Flat design took prevalence because raster-based products felt weird when seen on retina displays.

    I wonder how design will be affected when AI tools become the norm.

    • livus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Everything will have extra fingers.

      Seriously tho I think there will be a flight to intricacy.

    • nicerdicer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Perhaps there will be a time in the future when we look back to when everything was “just” flat design. Meanwhile the UI will adapt the aesthetics of AI generated imagery which will be the new design thing then. Everything will look overly saturated but also a bit blurry, like AI generated landscapes. .

      Or not. It depends on what data an AI will be fed with. Maybe it goes Frutiger Aero all over again (at least what the AI interpretation of Frutiger will be) since AI generators could be fed with the existing examples of such an era. We would have gone full circle.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you hewed to the ops memes incorrect description, Memphis would have been the 80s and mid 90s. It’s interesting that the meme takes into consideration the concept of the long 70s but then just goes back to ten year distinctions. windows 3 (I assume you’re not talking about the early dos shell stuff because no one ever is and you put it squarely amongst the contemporaries of 95, but I’ll give the benefit of the doubt since we’re talking design language) went from ‘90-2003 (with ME) macos 7-9 spanned ‘91-2001 and beos was 95-2000.

          It’s possible you aren’t sticking to that flawed understanding though, so let’s talk about design language and Memphis. You’re right that designs are informed by their tools and mediums. For Memphis group those tools were drafting paper and those mediums were chipboard and naugahide. Memphis group made couches and shelves, not software or digital art.

          Now that’s not to say that only stuff from a specific cadre of Italian designers made during a short period is Memphis and everything else is sparkling crayon scribbles, only that the stuff we actually recognize as Memphis wasn’t pixel art by any measure.

          Most of what is in the meme under Memphis isn’t even Memphis though, it’s pop art. I think the pants are a haring print…

          With all that said, what about windows (were you talking about windows 3+?), macos 7-9 and beos would you say were sparkling crayon scribbles, pop art or genuinely drawing from the design language of the Memphis group?

          • fixmycode@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was taking about icon packs. I didn’t know about the Memphis designers, thanks for the nice write-up

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It would be cool to have as much information about the icon design and window decorations of those oses as we have about the windows startup sound (look the making of that up sometime if you want to know the absolute heights of decadence software development hit and what Microsoft could do when they were really trying to compete with Apple).

              Reading back, I was a jerk in my response to you, getting all “well actually” over a meme about 90s kids because it used the wrong name for the language of different designs.

              Mea culpa. Im sorry.

  • wols@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t share the hate for flat design.
    It’s cleaner than the others, simpler and less distracting. Easier on the eyes, too. It takes itself seriously and does so successfully imo (nice try, aero). It feels professional in a way all the previous eras don’t - they seem almost child-like by comparison.

    Modern design cultivates recognizable interactions by following conventions and common design language instead of goofy icons and high contrast colors. To me, modern software interfaces look like tools; the further you go back in time, the more they look like toys.

    Old designs can be charming if executed well and in the right context. But I’m glad most things don’t look like they did 30 years ago.

    I’m guessing many people associate older designs with the era they belonged to and the internet culture at the time. Perhaps rosy memories of younger days. Contrasting that with the overbearing corporate atmosphere of today and a general sense of a lack of authenticity in digital spaces everywhere, it’s not unreasonable to see flat design as sterile and soulless. But to me it just looks sleek and efficient.
    I used to spend hours trying to customize UIs to my liking, nowadays pretty much everything just looks good out of the box.

    The one major gripe I have is with the tendency of modern designs to hide interactions behind deeply nested menu hopping. That one feels like an over-correction from the excessively cluttered menus of the past.
    That and the fact that there’s way too many “settings” sections and you can never figure out which one has the thing you’re looking for.

    P S. The picture did flat design dirty by putting it on white background - we’re living in the era of dark mode!

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    y2k the transparent plastics were when electronic manufacturing took pride in its products. (though I much prefer modern user interfaces)

  • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Aero: I liked the 2010-ish design best even though I was at least 20 at the time. I just found Memphis and y2k a little goofy. Win XP or this fish glass Mac are the worst for me.

    Maybe someone who is too young to have lived in the 90s finds this novel, I don’t know.

    Someone has written it here. There was at least some techno optimism left in 2012 or so and maybe that’s the time I am nostalgic for.

    Not so much the 90s “because we had no phones” - then turn your phone off.

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I started taking graphic design classes in the mid 2ks and the amount of my brain that has been squandered making everything look like shiny candy floating in a polished plastic void is disgusting.

      Then I learned how to make everything look like it was badly spray stenciled and drug through a post industrial alley so I could really stick it to the man.

    • Daevan@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not so much the 90s “because we had no phones” - then turn your phone off. >

      Whish it was that easy…