• Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly Valve should do a purge on this shit. People who brigade tag things like this get banned from using Steam community features.

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just like the two genders, male and political.

      Or the two sexual orientations, straight and political.

      When you’re used to privellage equality feels like persecution.

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    This game has looked like a complete dud that no one asked for to me from everything I’ve seen, but of course the vast majority of gamer complaints have seemed to be just frothing about WOKE DEI ESG frothingfash

    • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 months ago

      I recently realized that the vast majority of content that this crowd whines about isn’t very good on its own merits. For example, The Acolyte, which was middling at best from what I watched, got it hard from the Star Wars reactionary fans while Andor, which has an only slightly less diverse cast, did not. This indicates to me that while these people are sincere racists and probably really do believe that diverse casting signals a conspiracy against the white race, they also lack conviction and will fall silent if the treats are tasty enough.

      • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        what makes it even worse is that hollywood execs know when their movies/tv shows are shaping up to be total shit, and they purposefully lean into the culture war stuff to try and cause controversy and get free marketing. They also love using diverse casts as a shield, when they know they have a total stinker they think to themselves “well let’s at least make it filled with didactic liberal moralism” to shield themselves from criticism. That way when they get negative reviews for their absolute trash movie they can blame it on the reactionary review bombers, when it would have gotten bad reviews anyway

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Even if it was the greatest game in existence…there are like five of these on Steam that are free to play.

      They’re asking for the equivalent of $40 for this? lol, nope.

  • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really wish the vast majority of “hero shooters” were just co-op games. Sweaty PvP is so done for me. That’s part of the reason I like Warframe and Wayfinder and other “hero” style games. I like saving the day with the homies. These Concord characters all look fine to me, I think they’d make for fun co-op heroes

      • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Exactly dude, “hero” games I think get a bad rap cause they are all just Overwatch-clones or Overwatch adjacent (which is reductive but you know what I mean). I think the “hero” genre could do really do well to step out of “pushing the cart” or “holding the control point”. Like with most genres there is a lot of room to explore if you took even a step and a half outside the existing boundaries.

          • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That’s the thing that gets me mad, is that while they tell you they have a story, there is no meaningful way for you interact with that narrative. Or even be told that narrative in a way that makes sense because you’re always trying to secure objective or whatever. Maybe a little enviorment storytelling here or some special voice lines there, but in the game itself there is usually no real way to interact with the game world’s story in so many hero shooter games. Yeah there is “lore” but there usaully little story.

      • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I dig it. It’s a cartoon-y Saturday morning show about good guys fighting bad guys. I’m a sucker for that thing. Love the artstyle, the mechanics are fun and the looter-shooter-y isn’t groundbreaking but it nails the fundamentals. New gear feels exciting which is all I ask for.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    These are the subset of gamers that piss me off to no end… The early access game review bombing for poor optimization numbnuts are their own kind of special, but these folks just thrive on hatred…

    Every fucking steam discussion has a “WoKe GaMe?” Post…

    Reich wing propaganda working it’s way through society… We can thank Steve Bannon partially for wanting to aim for indoctrinating “rootless white male gamers”

    • GoebbelsDeezNuts [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      The early access game review bombing for poor optimization

      imo don’t do early access if you don’t want real criticism, it was supposed to be the whole reason you release in EA in the first place not just as a marketing hype generator

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t mean the so-called “AAA” dev/publisher early access that is like 4 days before release (read: exploiting those with little patience.)

        I mean the steam, often indie dev, “early access” that runs for a year plus because they’re using the early access to address bugs and to help optimize.

        • GoebbelsDeezNuts [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          to help optimize.

          I think I’ve lost the plot, how would they know they need to optimize if nobody were to tell them? Obviously there are good ways and bad ways to write criticism, but again if you release a game early its going to happen.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pretty much what you said. There are good and bad ways to say it. Review bombing and flipping out in the discussions is not the way, those are the people I was referring to though in my initial comment. Unfortunately there are way too many of them out there. :/

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Early access has been abused so much that devs are mostly forced to use EA in order to make a soft release.

      And not all indie devs are saints, why should you be able to charge any money for a literal alpha prototype? We are now paying to be not even beta but alpha testers?

      Again EA abuse completely destroyed the software developement foundations behind most indie devs. Way too many of them work on their game for a year and then release a crappy alpha.

      20 years ago the idea would be laughed at, today we pay money for any half decent prototype with slightly better than Unity Asset store models. That is the lowest barrier of entry and its understandable people have become cynical.

      Of course there are EA success stories obviously, from single devs that get it right to big “indie” studios but those are the exception.

      I think there are also quite a few devs that hide behind the “oh its still early access, there is still time” to hide behind their incompetence and/or unwillingless to fix bugs. Sometimes they’ll keep making promises of new content, adding more and more stuff and never looking back at their engine bugs etcs as a result EA is not a guarantee of bug free release even if “done right”. The devs may simply prioritize content over bugs.

      • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe my references are skewed, but I remember Minecraft’s alpha was $5, beta was $10, and the full release I think was $20 or something. Which both seemed really fair price-wise but also made sense as to making buying a game early appealing because you’re paying less for it; it’s not an act of charity to buy a game in early access. Now they seem to be charging full price and are basically going “uwu, i’m a smol indie-dev” and asking for people to donate money and faith to someone they don’t know because they’re petit-bourgeois.

  • vegeta1 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    I sincerely wish the sight of these groups causes intense psychic backlash and physical pain. This will be extra funny considering the vast majority of the world is non white. Maybe this explains why they’re adamant to vote fuckers that wanna accelerate climate catastrophe especially since it will hit the global south the hardest first.

  • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    So weird they picked this to hate on, cause it seems like a bit of an Overwatch clone, which also shares a lot in common with League of Legends.

    I know Overwatch has a few, but I played a lot of League and there are plenty of non-vanilla characters.

    These people just hate for hate’s sake.

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      They latched on to it because it’s total dogshit.

      It’s a Sony title that didn’t crack 700 concurrent players on its first day.

      Now there’s two possible reasons for this, one is that it’s a shitty looking generic paid pvp hero game. There’s literally half a dozen better free options with already existing communities and player bases.

      The other possibility is that it’s because there’s characters in it that aren’t straight white males.

      It would be like saying that the reason Steven Segal movies aren’t popular is because it stars a straight white guy and not because it’s a dogshit product by a dogshit person that looks worse than half a dozen free readily available options.

      • grandepequeno [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a Sony title that didn’t crack 700 concurrent players on its first day.

        Holy molly. You gotta wonder how many of these failed “games-as-a-service” attempts are black spots on these companies balance sheet that they cover with profits from actually good single player games, and yet they keep trying

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s because it’s shit and an easy target as a result.

      Anything that’s bad is because of le woke. They ignore it in anything good.