• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      mRNA vaccines. Net positive power output from fusion. Off the top of my head.

      I agree with your concept of capitalism killing innovation and forcing people into dead-end jobs. But that doesn’t mean technical innovation is dead. Just means it’s not progressing optimally and not benefiting the right people.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Generative AI too. It might be hammered into everything to the point of being tiresome, but it is technologically impressive that you can have a computer just synthesise a photo/video/music.

        Compare to 20 years ago. Being able to just go “Computer, create for me an original landscape painting”, and have it make one would be something that you’d only find on television/in movies.

    • discosnails@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      What we’re really fucking up is the ramp from fossil to advanced energy sources that could enable massive outward expansion into the solar system. The billionaires are forgetting that a larger piece of a smaller pie is still less pie.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    66 years is a long time. Considering that 1969 was 56 years ago, we still have 10 years to do something similarly worthwhile.

    … 10 years is also a long time. It can wait until tomorrow.

      • MrKoyun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        The AI thumbnail isnt real, YouTube faked it in a cooperation effort with the US government to seem like they were winning the AI war between them and China.

    • ayane_m@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve had that mindset of “10 years is a long time; what’s one more day” since adolescence. Boom, now it’s 16 years in the future and I’m suddenly a dysfunctional adult struggling to get through each day.

      But on the bright side, I just began medication for ADHD, and it’s not only life changing, it’s life saving. I feel capable, motivated, and determined for the first time in my life. Let’s build the future so that 2035 will be a milestone for humanity!

    • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well the equivalent would be to leave the the solar system for this kind of step up. I don’t see even setting foot on Mars by 2035…

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think that is as big as the moon landing. Finding alien life would be more in the same vein.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          We would need a significant technological boost to be able to see the surfaces of alien worlds, I think that technology alone would be a candidate for innovation. After all whether or not we find aliens is not dependant on the technology but depending on if there are any to find.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wanted to show real time rendered graphics in the same interval, but there were no real time graphics in 1959.

    Still, these two are 33 years apart, so we can do half.

    New technologies tend to explode very quickly while there is obvious iteration and improvement from a new principle left on the table and then they settle down as the room for improvement shrinks.

    • not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      fyi: you can make these show up in your comment by using

      ! [](imagelink)

      without the space between ! and [

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        My experience with how these are rendered in different apps is… inconsistent. I’m not on a Lemmy instance, so I end up going with the simplest option.

        If and when all Fedi apps do this properly… well, at that point I wouldn’t have to add anything manually, would I?

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Rockets are far older than airplanes and have absolutely nothing in common with each other, other than “things you do in the air”. It’s equivalent to taking a shit and brushing your teeth. Not connected at all.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Except they absolutely influence each other and to pretend like there is a world where one exists without the other, especially building a spaceworthy rocket, is just wrong. Aerospace principles are highly intertwined even if the application of knowledge gained from either is applied differently.

        I would say that they’re like brushing and flossing. Very different on the face of it but the background to either is completely linked to the other. Each informs and aids the practice of the other.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You could argue that spitting out some pixels on a CRT has about as much to do with rendering millions of polygons into multiple frame buffers and collecting the whole thing into a digital image to output over HDMI.

        The OP makes a decent leap in terms of “things that move us away from the ground”, I don’t have a problem with it, even if there are a handful of big changes in methodology along the way.

        I mean, if we take your caveat at face value we end up with some combination of the Concorde, a F-35, the A380 and a remote controlled drone. Honestly, the point stands just as well.

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    If it’s true that these two photographs are only separated by 66 years, does that mean that NASA faked the moon landing on the beach at Kitty Hawk?

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hard to believe that man landed on the moon only 60+ years after landing on Earth. Makes you wonder what’s next

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well there is the Artemis program although it seems massively overly complicated.

        SLS is basically just the Apollo rocket again, except without a lander. Then they’re going to dock with a space station that they haven’t built, and transfer via the space station onto a lander produce by SpaceX (although possibly there will be others), then land on the moon in the lander;and construct a permanent habitat on the moon. Presumably the space station will do something other than serve as a transfer system but I don’t really know what.

        With the trump administration though it’s anyone’s guess what happens I’m assuming that they’ll probably cut funding so it won’t happen anyway.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      what is even the point of this graph? GDP is a nonsensical metric that barely tells anything about the economy, let alone society and technology.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        you could substitute almost any other graph. This isn’t about GDP really, just about change.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        i think it’s not meant too literally, more like a meme, to make fun of people who say sci-fi will forever stay sci-fi while at the same time things change very quickly.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Even if you don’t care about money, you shouldn’t be feeling like you’re on steady well-trodden ground if you live on the side of a steep slope like this. The same would go for e.g. scientific output (however that’s measured), world population, agricultural output, and so on.