• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never wanted to get all my devices totally detached from google until recently.

    They are going full mask off right now.

    They’re prepping to be the surveillance service for the global fascist oligarchy.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    3 days ago

    An accurate title would read something like: Google wants to make side loading apps more difficult by adding extra steps under the guise of security in order to maintain market dominance and continue spying on the user.

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      F-Droid store/repo is safer than Google Play Store. Google’s own store has many shady apps, including spyware and occasionnal malware.

      I don’t get the argument that Play Store is safer than others.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every year that goes by mobile computing gets less and less interesting.

    Might as well just buy the cheapest one that will do the job and call it done. So sense in spending top dollar very often when it is just a severely limited black box, like a video game console.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sure, to make it safer in the same way Microsoft made you safer by making it harder to install Linux with UEFI.

    • agelord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Isn’t it actually easier with UEFI since you can have multiple bootloaders and updating windows doesn’t overwrite any other bootloaders? I think the issue arises from secureboot

  • limerod@reddthat.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ridiculous, mother of bullshit! Switching to Linux appears to be the only option left for a personal computing device.

      • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Where did you hear this? I’ve seen a couple of articles on this now but none of them have mentioned its specifically play protect or that it can be turned off

      • Draconic NEO@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can’t seriously actually trust that turning it off in the Google owned app they control or update will be meaningful. I’m really sick of people claiming it is, and I hope this will get them to realize that.

        If you want to crush it fully, disable google play store as a whole, and make sure to tell your friends too because if that solution doesn’t get more popular there might not be third party apps to install since the devs will just quit.

        • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I dunno, you’re the one claiming stuff that isn’t necessarily true (yet). This is a proposed update to Google Play Protect. You don’t have to have Google Play Protect enabled, and disabling it doesn’t really impact anything unless you’re the type of person to just download an apk from unverified sources.

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      In this time and age, do you still doubt that Linux might be outlawed for consumers? To prevent criminal activity, of course /s.

      • limerod@reddthat.comM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        They already consider you a criminal if you use grapheneOS on a pixel. It’s not a joke.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Honestly we need a community OS like Android/Chome OS

      I like Linux but it would be really cool to have a OS that was less modular and more purpose built. I feel like there is enough people interested that we could raise some money to hire some developers. On think Chome OS and Android get right is the hassle free unified experience.

      • lemmysmash@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s GrapheneOS that I think would try to address this problem — secure, proper architecture, compatible with some major app stack (e.g. Android apps). It’s AOSP-based, but they’re already thinking ahead up to a point where they would be forced to fork it and even work with OEMs to create their own phone hardware for it. There are a couple of threads on their Mastodon.

        I don’t know how much they would be able to achieve, but I would pay for such system.

          • lemmysmash@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, unfortunately. It’s their con, but also their pro at the same time. It’s bad because they end up isolated from everyone else playing nice with each other, and then no one wants to deal with them, but they also don’t agree on compromises that might hinder security or the stability and development of their project. And I respect that. That is partly a reason why they created probably the most secure and private AOSP distrubution nowadays.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              they don’t compromises that might hinder security or the stability

              I call BS on that one. It feels more to me like they are seeking power and control. They could seriously benefit from working with other projects but they don’t.

  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hopefully there are Linux phones available in near future.

    If not, I’ll probably buy an iPhone. When both phone OS are locked down, might as well get the one that’s supported for years.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can’t convince me this wasn’t Google’s plan from the very beginning.

        • Open source it, Gain market share,
        • Push ads/capitalize on data harvesting
        • Corner OEMs to include their malware
        • Gradually make it harder for ROM developers to gain access
        • Lock it down
        • Profit

        They stole tons of features from custom ROMs but never implemented the ability to turn off internet for specific apps so they could push ads and track users.They made turning location “on” a requirement to scan wifi, calling it a security feature. They re-enable “background data” on all apps with an Android update. These are just off the top of my head.

        Chromium works towards same goal as well. They never wanted to defeat apple, monopoly, they wanted to become part of the duopoly.

  • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the meantime, we’re already verifying signatures for sideloaded apps. Can’t say the same about play store apps.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Great, Apple style app notarization is just about the last thing I want on my damn phone.