• HornyOnMain [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    jesus-cleanse Conservatives Christians really think this image of Jesus is about him going into the temple to throw out all the woke they/them liberals using the lord’s house to eat avocado toast and complain about climate change or some shit

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      How conservative christians became the greatest opponent of environmentalism will likely forever remain a mystery for me. If there is one thing worth conserving it would be gods creation surely?

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same way they can look at the metaphor for capitalists are destined for hell a la stuffing a camel through the eye of a needle unharmed - by choosing to interpret the eye of a needle to actually mean a gate arch or some shit.

        Instead of changing yourself to follow the beliefs in the word of your God, you change your God’s words to follow your beliefs.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, on the one hand, you have an old book you might read all the way through once (but probably not) that says to be responsible stewards of the earth. But on the other hand, you have people on the TV every night telling you to support whatever makes corporations the most money.

        Old ideas can have value but it’s hard to compete with new ideas when those new ideas have a lot more money and can be crafted to appeal to a specific audience (regardless of what’s true).

        • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Considering that the part about being stewards of god’s creation is mentioned in the first chapter of the bible it’s a feat to have missed it. But here we are

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always figured their reply would be “Well, if the environment is going to shit that that’s what God wants. Don’t question his master plan. He only does things or let’s things happen for a reason.”

        • TheBaldFox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The faster we ruin the earth the closer we get to the apocalypse the sooner Christ returns and Yadda Yadda Yadda or some shit.

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “the earth was always meant to be temporary” is one I heard. Which for one thing rests on some heavy assumptions but also it is murder according the Jesus to be ok with your actions killing some farmer in Angola

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was a study linked around somewhere in the last few days that said that political ideology was a greater factor in people’s religious choices than the inverse.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A chunk of my extended family buys into this and it is part of why I don’t ever visit them anymore. A couple of them listen to radio stations that preach this 24/7. Grandma was really religious and was the kind of person to hire immigrants, underpay them, then complain about immigrants being moneyless sinners. That side of the family amazes me…

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately a literal reading of Genesis 1:28 says to subdue the Earth (master or control in a few translations, and use all the resources for God’s purpose in one). Those trying to paint a nicer picture might change it to being stewards of the planet (which is what I always heard as a kid), but that’s not what’s there. To be fair, it was written in a time where the world seemed endless and humans couldn’t possibly destroy everything, a mindset that lasts to this very day. Even less than a century ago we were okay with dumping stuff into the water or burying it, or burning things because it was a huge world and the smoke disappeared into the sky.

        • pthaloblue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The really wild one is the Ann Coulter reading:

          “God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, “Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours.”

          (Referring to Dominionism and Genesis 1:28, on Hannity & Colmes, 20 June 2001)

      • boCash@lemmy.blugatch.tube
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because that would require a modicum of critical reasoning and the willingness to occasionally and ever-so-slightly sacrifice for the benefit of others.

        Just remember that the group you’re describing are conservatives first and foremost. Christianity and the GOP are just their current excuses for their selfishness.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you seen the episode of Avatar where the fortune teller said the village wouldn’t be destroyed by the volcano?

        We believe the world won’t be destroyed by mankind.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        And a lot of anti-environmentalists are hunters and farmers. Like… ¿¿¿What???

      • HornyOnMain [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah we have a ton of really obscure ones that are barely ever used because we’ve been adding to the list for the last three years, iirc we had around ~1150 before federation but since then we’ve added a load more so idk how many we’ve got now

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    You missed the part where they said, “No I don’t, but I’ll ruin your life if you teach it!”

    It’s only taught in higher ed, so this clearly didn’t happen. /s

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish it really did hurt to be stupid. Those suffering from it would be much more inclined to correct the condition rather than delighting in it like they do now.

    • example@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      seems to be a federation issue for you, I see 90+ comments (reported by client, not counted), earliest from 9h ago

        • example@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          reddthat.com.
          you should also see that when you click my name, if it doesn’t already show it on my name.

          to be fair, iirc it was only a total of 3 comment threads at the time, where two were started by lemmy.world users and one by a hexbear.net user. as those instances are on your instances block list, that would enough to hide the entire comment threads I believe.

  • Joe_0237@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Conservative Christian” is and oxymoron but having never read any Jesus, its easy to identify that way.

    First of all you don’t become a conservative Christian by being willing to read. So lets imagine DeSantis misspoke and said “The only way to ensure that Trump can violate The Constitution and overthrow our democracy is to read the New Testament and understand it”

    Here are some probable outcomes:

    • They see that Jesus is a leftist and can no longer call themselves Christian, when asked their religion they say “none, atheiest”.
    • They see that Jesus is a leftist and conclude that the bible was simply written by leftists and that it isn’t true.
    • They see that Jesus has good ideas, unconsciously redefine what conservative means to them, and stay quiet until someone they considerd a friend angrily calles them a libtard for stating one of jesuses teachings in disagreement of something thet had repeated from facebook.
    • They see that Jesus is a leftist, they trust in their lord choosing his love and reason over the hatred and fear of man and can no longer call themselves a conservative.
    • They conclude that Pontius Pilate and the Roman government where the good guys and Jesus was an evil libtard who earned his crusofiction and they start worshoping Pilate instead.
    • The whole thing goes over the readers head
    • They strengthen their belief by ignoring parts that clearly don’t fit their belief, and twisting anything that can kind of fit their beliefs.
  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we make c/politicalmemes and keep this sort of content there? It’s clearly a point of division in the community, we should be more accommodating for apolitical folks.

    • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no such thing as ‘apolitical’. The very idea of leaving politics to our superior politicians is what brought us and keeps us in this state.

      This is not at all a political issue however. This is about not being a trash human being. Being racist is not a political opinion, it’s spreading hatred in the world and being a waste of skin.

      • amelia@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes there are comments that I wish I could upvote multiple times, this is one of them.

      • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not arguing for or against of what the post says, I’m only saying that the designated place for funny cat pictures is probably not the right place for a meaningful discussion, sharing opinions, education or anything else but funny cat pictures.

        When i browse c/memes I want to see easily digestible posts that will make me exhale through my nose, not deep, thought provoking walls of text.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think this post is deep and thought provoking then I don’t know what to tell you. It just makes fun of american conservatives and that’s it. This post is literally just “conservatives dumb”, as easily digestible as I’ve ever seen.

          • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then c/politicalmemes would be a perfect place for conservatives and progressives to call each other dumb and let everyone else on c/memes enjoy their funny cats.

              • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then you could subscribe to both communities. Think of it as having a separate category for gay and straight porn, some people are into both, some into one or the other, some into neither and because it’s in its own category everyone can pick exactly what they want to see.

                • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If porn was only categorised by gender and orientation that would be great, but it’s not. There’s a million obscure communities for every single aspect of every fetish, and there’s usually zero way to include everything but feet and piss. It takes so much effort to find something fresh because you have to intentionally look up skirts, or lesbian domination, or voyeurism or what have you.

                  Maybe something you’d like is in feet, because of a brief under the table socks on tease, and that’s just a tragedy because that’s just fine.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes but where’s the meme? All I see is a smarmy quip, there’s no joke, there’s not even a picture. It’s just a screenshot of text.

        Even if you agree with the subject matter, you have to admit this is terribly low effort and low quality as far as memes go.

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is math also political?

        Yes. Statistics for example gets politicized all the time, remember when Trump said not to monitor for covid because monitoring it will only find more cases?

        Also, possibly the most classic example of misuse of statistics in politics is the assertion of “statistics show black people commit more crimes per capita than white people.” When in reality, black people in the West have much lower median incomes than white people due to their long history of facing marginalization and descrimination, and it’s income that is correlated to crime, not race. We know this because when you normalize for income, there is no difference in crime rates yet that fallacious statistic gets brought up by racists again and again to justify their racism.

    • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      People come here to get away from the depressing reality of life, not to be overburdened by it.

      I don’t see why you’re downvoting this. By that logic, you might as well post this in food communities and furry porn communities as well.

  • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    198
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s sad really. This post was the final straw for me. I’ll be unsubscribing. I saw the same thing happen dankmemes. Post after post of politically charged, right leaning nonsense. My tinfoil hat says it’s intentional to kill Lemmy, and honestly it’s working.

      • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        156
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, this post when interpreted as ironic, is making fun of socialism and CRT. Regardless it is leveraging oft used conservative boogeymen buzzwords for a joke. It dilutes the original use of the words, and whether or not intended, degrades their meaning. It’s a very common tactic of fascism and hard right actors. It’s exactly what Trump did when assuming the ‘fake news’ moniker and repurposing it to attack media. This entire site has been circling the drain for some time, and the downvotes just prove none of you value actual discussion.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          161
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point of the post couldn’t have gone any further over your head if it had wings

          • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            99
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you read what I’m saying, the intent matters not. It’s the use sarcastically or not in a joking way that plays right into right leaning agenda. But please keep attacking me.

            • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              53
              ·
              1 year ago

              The fact that it uses sarcasm and mentions CRT doesn’t automatically mean it’s right leaning. Left leaning people could find this meme funny.

              • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                56
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again, it’s their use in a joke that delivers the whole discussion around CRT into the shitter, enabling right wing agenda. They’re not out to win the argument, they’re out to muddy the waters.

                • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The discussion started in the shitter, it’s never not been in the shitter. Did you think that Chris Rufo was making some high minded philosophical point when he wrote about making everything CRT as a weapon?

            • Skoobie@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              47
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, intent matters a little at least, right? Like, I prefer to use the term progressive when describing myself and I found this meme to be a firm chuckle and not problematic. It’s saying that the logic used by things like CRT is thematically identical to logic used in biblical texts, which many on the right would actually oppose politically and ideologically.

              So like, if the intent was to reframe CRT in a biblical light so as to show ethical inconsistency on the part of Republicans, and it works on a logical and a humourous level, what exactly is the problem?

              • enkers@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                36
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s saying that the logic used by things like CRT is thematically identical to logic used in biblical texts…

                I don’t think it’s even going that far. I interpreted it as the conservative throwing the term around glibly without any actual understanding of what it means, simply because they don’t like what is being said, and a perhaps a very tenuous connection.

                • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah. It was intentionally made into a boo phrase and thought terminating cliche. Chris Rufo has a lot to answer for, in poisoning the well of discourse in this country. Not that it wasn’t already pretty terrible, but an ocean of piss is no excuse to dump barrels of cyanide.

        • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          58
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m going to take your response in good faith and tell you that it’s making fun of right wing people who are against critical race theory by using what is probably their own religion of Christianity to do it. To have Moses say what they’re doing and how ridiculous it sounds.

          • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            61
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I understand that. You’re the first one to trust I have a point. Trolling from either side serves right wing agendas. It degrades the discussion. I know this is a meme thread, but this thread has been nonstop political garbage for about a month.

            • enkers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I feel like you might be ignoring the purpose of satirical content. IMO, it serves two purposes: the first is to entertain and consolidate people who already agree with the message, the second is to raise cognitive dissonance in those that disagree with the message by raising awareness of hypocrisy.

              As someone who cut their teeth on 4chan and ended up harbouring some fairly bigoted views, political satire is a large part of why I eventually abandoned those views.

              To write it off as ineffective or even counterproductive seems to me to be a gross misunderstanding of its purpose.

            • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The right wing won’t return you the favor, you’re giving them too much credit. Facism didn’t lose to kindness in WW2.

            • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, you may be right in that it serves right wing agendas but I have no idea since I’m not right wing. I do know they deserve to be made fun of regardless if they think it helps them or not. I feel that a lot of them are fascists, racists, trolls, etc. so it doesn’t really matter if we make fun of them because they’re pretty ingrained. I also don’t think it devalues CRT or makes anything normalized, we’re just making fun of hypocrites.

        • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re alienating your allies here. This is clearly intended to be left leaning, and you’re lumping OP with Trump and facists.

            • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, so, I am reading what you’re saying, and I don’t really know how one could make a joke that isn’t, by your understanding, part of the conservative agenda.

              And if that’s what you think, I am curious why you’re looking at memes at all.

              • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                31
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s a universe of thing’s worth joking about, but this post just serves political agendas, mostly right wing ones, and isn’t funny. CRT has become such a punching bag it’s lost all meaning. I’ve had the experience of my (very different) field of study becoming a political football, and the end result was the field suffering for years afterwards. Those setbacks are due to the right wing of political discourse choosing to meme the subject and make it political. The very act of targeting it was the main transgression, but subsequent meming on both sides only dragged things down further.

                • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So, telling people to not try and be funny, even those you agree with, is definitely alienating your allies. I hear what you’re saying, but I have also seen parents losing their ever loving shit at PTA meetings… And to say that everyone must treat those ignorant displays with quiet respect, because CRT was mentioned… Seems a bit beyond the pale.

          • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            46
            ·
            1 year ago

            The downvotes only validate I’m right that this site is in the shitter. You just assume because the message is liberal, it doesn’t play into right leaning agendas.

            • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              46
              ·
              1 year ago

              The downvotes only validate I’m right

              You’re not Galileo. To quote Carl Sagan:

              “They laughed at Gallileo. They also laughed at Bozo the clown.”

            • hoot@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              33
              ·
              1 year ago

              “I’m getting down voted so this site is terrible and everyone on it is an idiot. There is no chance that my position was interpreted incorrectly, I missed the point, or I am wrong - it’s obviously everyone else”.

        • Dick Justice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be honest it sounds like you don’t want people to mock conservatives, and that’s a tough ask when they make it so easy.

          • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sort of. I’m saying mocking only lowers the overall dialogue into the shitter, which doesn’t serve the purpose you think. It may make you feel morally superior, but does nothing to fix the issue, and arguably further entrenches the two sides.

            • Dick Justice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well and now you’re inching up on “both sides” territory, which just makes me wonder if your outrage is even genuine.

        • Wereduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the meme is fairly clearly making fun of American conservative/fascist discourse. Like the whole watering down of any semblance of a working definition of CRT when referenced by right wing pundits and moral panic board meeting parents, where right wing people call every call to be somewhat decent human beings “CRT” or “wokism”, and then have no actual working meaning for those words except as something that seems left wing and makes them uncomfortable.

        • getynge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand all the component words here and still have absolutely no understanding of how you can make your assertions so confidently this makes no sense.

        • lucidwielder@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          just prove none of you value actual discussion.

          This is a meme sub. Would be like me getting upset at people for posting Linux related questions under the Linux sub vs some tech sub or Windows sub.

          There are proper places to have discussions and if you think a meme sub is one of them then you are going to have a bad time. Whether it plays into the hands of conservatives or not is another debate - but generally speaking I do not think making fun of their religion and views in this manner is something they can really weaponize. At some point they are likely to reach a tipping point where more and more people find them insufferable and start tuning them out. People can rarily keep using the same playbook to engage people over and over without them getting tired &/or fed up with it and them eventually.

          A good number of us caught on to their grift early on, but en masse, people are slow and dumb. Sadly they need time to catch up to the latest scams and new mediums.

      • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy was already dying, just look at plots of active users since the Reddit API flap. It’s going down not up. The sooner it does, the sooner a stronger decentralized platform, or newer version of Lemmy, can take it’s place. It’s current iteration is a rickety Reddit clone that suffers from rolling defederation.

        • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t claim Lemmy was or wasn’t dying. I said that you unsubbing wasn’t going to kill Lemmy.

          I really doubt Lemmy is dying though. In much the same way Mastodon isn’t dead merely because the Twitter exodus stopped. It’ll come and go in waves, just like Mastodon I expect. Or maybe it’ll go back to pre-Reddit numbers, when it still wasn’t dead.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          If Lemmy dies I’m going back to Reddit. Don’t act like Lemmy dying is going to be a win for the fediverse.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, yes please it’s absolutely dying. You should find somewhere new to post asap, this is not negotiable.

          Please leave.