Guys, when you talk about the Fediverse to friends, family, or colleagues, how do you explain it?

Do you call it a “decentralized social network,” an “alternative to big tech,” or “a collection of open-source networks”? And how do you convince someone to create an account on Mastodon, Lemmy, Pixelfed, etc., without them getting scared by technical terms like instance, federated, or peer-to-peer?

I’m asking because my so-called friends don’t believe me and even call me crazy when I talk about this “nonsense.”

The future is open source, decentralized, and federated!

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t. It’s bad enough that people spend too much time on social media. Why the fuck would i introduce another one?

    I’m practically only here because rif died. Its not because it’s enjoyable. I open the app to maybe see one good post among the thousands and thousands of “same”-posts.

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t. It’s bad enough that people spend too much time on social media. Why the fuck would i introduce another one?

      I’m practically only here because rif died. Its not because it’s enjoyable. I open the app to maybe see one good post among the thousands and thousands of “same”-posts.

      You made me think.

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    A free and open source social media platform supported only by the users and not by spying on its users.

    • Aneb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah but then there’s still no buy in from friends and family. They are most likely going to retort “Well none of my friends use it”. We could have open source social media in 2020s but people don’t want to use something they don’t know. Meta is comfortable for them and they are OK with being tracked and monitored by Meta intelligence, its stupid that they rather live like that but only they can change their minds

      • xylogx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The reality is it will take some disruptive force to alter the status quo. Maybe the government splitting up tech giants, maybe some public backlash to current events or maybe we will be invaded by aliens. Whatever it is, I will be waiting here on the Fediverse to welcome any and all who wish to join. Now having glimpsed a world free of invasive spying and constant manipulation to buy more stuff, I will never go back.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t. I say oh yeah I read that on Lemmy. They don’t ask, I don’t offer.

    If for some reason they say what is Lemmy? I say just a community version of Reddit not run by companies.

    They never ask further, so I don’t need to start explaining parallels to email.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Here’s a better link from mastodon. It gives you a preview and has no ads.

    “I’m trying to cut down on social media.”

    Great, mastodon isn’t optimised for engagement, it’s just stuff you follow in chronological order.

  • Yeahigotskills2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Just wait until they get banned from reddit, get them to sign up and show them the Boost client (that used to work on reddit) and away they’ll go. That’s how i did it :-)

  • Tuukka R@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    The whole thing with federating is irrelevant to most users.

    I tell them it’s a social media built in a way that makes it impossible for any company to take over it in order to make profit. And then I show them to some instance I’ve hand-picked for them, without really telling them there are other instances as well. It’s not something they should worry about at that point. I can explain it later on, anyway.

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The whole thing with federating is irrelevant to most users.

      I tell them it’s a social media built in a way that makes it impossible for any company to take over it in order to make profit. And then I show them to some instance I’ve hand-picked for them, without really telling them there are other instances as well. It’s not something they should worry about at that point. I can explain it later on, anyway. interesting!

  • observes_depths@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    When people start talking about why they deleted instagram etc because of all the ads and time wasting, I tell them I’m using / posting on Pixelfed etc because it’s community owned, no ads, no brainwashing. That gets them interested but not enough to go and figure out what an instance is.

  • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    I normally just say, “I read [x] on Lemmy.”

    If they ask and are genuinely curious what that is, I tell them it’s like a reddit offshoot, but the users control the network and servers with a high level of transparency in administration/moderation and run off software that can have tens of thousands of crowdsourced eyes helping to find and fix any bug or security issue.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yup, I just namedrop Lemmy and don’t explain unless people ask. Usually then the explanation is simple and about how I’ve chosen not to use Reddit for ethical reasons.

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I normally just say, “I read [x] on Lemmy.”

      If they ask and are genuinely curious what that is, I tell them it’s like a reddit offshoot, but the users control the network and servers with a high level of transparency in administration/moderation and run off software that can have tens of thousands of crowdsourced eyes helping to find and fix any bug or security issue.

      interesting!

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    “The memes and news site I use.”

    That’s it. No infodumping, no explaining the technicalities, just tell them “just pick one, it’s basically like a username” and worry about it only if they want to learn about the underside of it.

    We don’t “explain” email to people - they just pick a site, sign up, and move on.

    Working in tech I learned to only explain the workings of something if they ask since most users are perfectly fine on a surface level and can intuit more than we credit them for once they know the basic gist.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t bother explaining it unless asked. I just share content with them. They can figure it out if they’re interested.

    If I am asked, then it’s “a decentralized platform similar to…” whatever. Most folks are “don’t know, don’t care” when it comes to anything technical.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t really bother until they’re looking for an alternative.

    When I’ve put people on Linux, to make an analogy, it’s basically been because they entrust me with their choice of new computer, not because I won an argument about the relative merits of different software licences.

    Most people IRL aren’t even on Reddit, so Lemmy wouldn’t make any sense for them. People might be on Twitter, but for whatever reason it hasn’t come up, so no Mastodon either. Mostly I hear about Tiktok and Instagram for the young, and Facebook for the old. Pixelfed is Instagram-ish IIRC, but I’m not sure how active it is.

    Edit: And if people want whichever platform they have the most friends on, well, they’re obviously in the last 50% of the population you can recruit.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t. Even I don’t like it here. I’m just a man of principle so I’m not going back to Reddit so this’ll have to do.

      • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Quite a homogenous user base with incredibly predictable reactions and views on world events, and the feed is basically just US politics and other news articles designed to make people angry or reinforce their pre-existing beliefs. This simply isn’t a fun place to be. The so-called “regrettable minutes” make up a really high percentage of the total time spent here. And that’s even after I’ve blocked virtually all of the worst communities and users, as well as built a long list of content filters based on keywords. I just have no desire to recommend anyone come here, since I’d consider that bad advice. This is a perfect example of what’s wrong with social media. Reddit’s nowhere near perfect either, but I was much less unhappy there.

        • Tuukka R@piefed.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You could just read from sources you have subscribed to and skip the “All”. That way you don’t need to bother with content filters :) You also aren’t really forced to follow the communities that are about US politics.