• Javi@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Whilst an average film overall, the movie ‘In Time’ has an interesting concept for currency set in a near future sci fi dystopia.

    Humanity has cured aging, and everyone stops aging at 25. Then their clock starts; indicated by a tattoo like digital clock on their forearm. Everything is paid for with time taken off their clock, once it reaches 0, they immediately die. Jobs pay employees a time salary etc, and the rich horde and manipulate the time markets to concentrate their wealth, and keep the poor from achieving the immortality they horde.

    I enjoyed it, and I’m sure plenty others did, but there’s no denying that a rather large suspension of belief is required.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think it’s a clever metaphor for the disparity in living standards and the real value of human life in a corrupt marketplace.

      But the actual implementation of the story was a bit clumsy and heavy handed.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In Time is definitely one of my favorite movies. It has some great world building around this concept.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We’re literally living that life and we’ve always lived it since the dawn of currency, fiat.

      How long you’re going to survive after you reach zero wealth left to your own devices, homeless on the streets? Until the first rough winter?

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Depends on how resourceful you are. You don’t automatically die once you run out of money. Also, no amount of money grants immortality.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Be a medieval peasant.

    Harvest comes in

    Load 1,000 pounds of produce onto a mule

    Mule dies

    Throw mule and produce on shoulders

    Walk to market

    Set up stall

    Sign: “Apples - 1 gold piece”

    Sell a single apple

    Am now the wealthiest man in town

    Go across the street to buy a wool tunic

    Attempt to make change

    Merchant cannot make change for a single gold piece

    So he kills me and becomes wealthiest man in town

    Repeat this for every shop in town

    Literally one guy left in village

    Mongols show up

    Take gold piece

    Return to China

    China countries to be the wealthiest country on Earth for another century

    • Bysmuth@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      the why did the wealthiest man in town give all his fortune for a single apple?

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m making a mars-themed luanti modpack (it’s FOSS and available here btw), and i intend to use water as the currency, if i ever get to trading.

    Water is a scarce and useful resource on Mars. That’s all it takes to make a meaningful currency out of it.

    • resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The problem with using water as currency is that it is heavy. It is not reasonable to carry around large amounts. You’ll need some kind of representational currency.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Caves of Qud uses water as currency. I think it explains this by making all of its characters weirdo radiation freakazoids that can teleport and fly around and stuff.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        You’ll need some kind of representational currency

        yep that’s exactly what i think would make sense in the real world. basically a paper currency backed by real water. one dollar represents 1 kg of water.

        it’s like the gold standard, just not backed by gold but by water.

        in the game that doesn’t matter though since you can just carry around a lot of water bottles before your inventory space runs out.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That works until someone starts manipulating the market by redeeming their dollars for water, selling the water on the market, getting dollars again, redeeming for more water and continuously profiting from the endless cycle.

          This is actually why the gold standard ended. Money and real world materials will fluctuate in value and are sold on different markets. Having money pegged to a real world material means someone can take advantage of a treasury by manipulating those markets. This was happening with the US dollar, then the Nixon shock happened and no more gold standard.

          Why would people in the future use a currency system that’s similar to one that we used in the past and stopped using because it was fundamentally flawed and vulnerable to manipulation? I suppose if it’s set in a small community where there isn’t anyone that would work out how to manipulate the currency it might work. But if there were bad actors, you’d expect a water based currency system to be manipulated same as the gold based system was before the Nixon shock.

        • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Kinda fucked up that when coming up with a SciFi dystopia the worst we can think of is the Nestlé-buck.

          • dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It is telling, isn’t it?

            To pivot I can also imagine information and energy scarcity, be it real or artificial.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Down And Out in the Magic Kingdom, by Cory Doctorow:

    This future history book takes place in the 22nd century, mostly in Walt Disney World. Walt Disney World Disney World is run by rival adhocracies, each dedicated to providing the best experience to the park’s visitors and competing for the Whuffie the guests offer. In the post-scarcity world of the novel, Whuffie is a currency-like system that primarily measures the esteem of others, or in the case of extremely low Whuffie, their disdain.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If I made a sci-fi game I would just make the currency MWh. They handwave away so much science, why not have a watch sized device that can store insane amounts of power?

    Which makes me wonder, is there a physics limit to the density of energy? There has to be, anyone know what it’s called?

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      […] why not have a watch sized device that can store insane amounts of power?

      Because Hiroshima was leveled by “only” 20 MWh (cost ranges from 120€ in northern Scandinavia to 1010€ in Greece) so having people carry energy wallets with enough to make more around day to day is like paying your groceries bill with C4 (which is perfectly save as long as there is no primary explosive).

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, but they will have a perfect safe containment device, and a way to transfer safely, just like they have FTL.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      is there a physics limit to the density of energy

      the physics limit to the density of energy is literally a black hole. it compresses the maximum amount of mass (energy) into a space. but that’s technologically useless since you can’t extract the energy out of it on-demand.

      The densest ways of storing energy that are technologically useful are:

      • batteries (Na-Ion batteries: 0.2 kWh/kg)
      • oil/carbon-based fuels (bread: 5 kWh/kg)
      • uranium (pure uranium: 24 * 10^6 kWh/kg)

      There’s also speculative technologies like antimatter (24 * 10^9 kWh/kg) which aren’t available today.

      Source

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The beauty of using uranium as currency is that if anyone hoards too much of it, the problem takes care of itself.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          If the well, event horrizon expands when a blackhole takes more mass, why can’t we just figure out how much volume it is compressed into by measuring the event horrizon increase?

          We know the matter that goes in is a certain size. Maybe we can deduce the total size it is compressed to? And the size the blackhole gains.

          • rtxn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            It’s impossible to know based on the current understanding of particle physics. A black hole is formed when the inward gravitational force exceeds the outward neutron degeneracy pressure of a sufficiently massive object, which is what keeps neutrons from occupying the same space (not really, it’s complicated). Beyond that, only conjecture exists with no evidence, and the information paradox makes it impossible to observe the space inside the event horizon.

    • AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Stellaris is a space 4x game that uses energy as a universal currency. The Endless Space games are also 4x games that use ancient nanomachines called Dust as currency.

      And yes, concentrating energy increases mass. E=MC^2, which means more Energy must necessarily mean more Mass. So basically gravity will be your hard limit, theoretically stuffing enough energy into small enough a place will create a black hole, though I assume if you’re talking electricity then there’s probably some physical limit you would hit first.

    • tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      We have technological limits to the storage efficiencies of different types of batteries. Batteries defined as something that can store useable energy. If we are talking just energy, matter “stores” lots of energy, and you can look at the famous Einstein equation to play with numbers. I do know we have something like a matter density limit in black holes.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is what I love about the Legend of Zelda games, it’s “rupee”, which comes from “ruby”:

    Rupee is likely derived from or a corruption of ruby, a valuable gemstone. As a result, Rupees were frequently misnamed early in the series, such as the name “Rupy” in the original The Legend of Zelda. In the German versions of The Legend of Zelda games, a Rupee is called a Rubin, which is German for ruby. Ironically, Red Rupees resemble rubies.

    They’re valuable gems of indeterminate size, not necessarily related to rubies or actual gems (could be glass or something), and have no direct comparison to any actual currency (unlike gold) but we can understand some amount of inherent value (better than credits). It’s unique to the game, and denominated as a single number.

    Some other ideas for units:

    • sovereigns - as long as the person in charge is a king
    • in-game term related to the region (like Euro is to Europe)
    • chips - could be metal, glass, gemstones, etc

    Keep it vague so people don’t lose immersion by comparing to realm world units, or not have any inherent wealth. That said, “credits” is better than “gold,” just a bit cliché.

    • Wolfizen@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Metro series games use bullets as a currency. Theyre small, not easily produceable in the setting, and have inherent value (you can shoot your money at enemies). Great design.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You can also get weird with it. Brandon Sanderson likes to tie money to a world’s magic system so in the world where people have metal based magic it’s coins called clips and boxings, but in the world where hurricanes make gemstones glow with magic it’s spheres of glass with gems called chips, marks, and broams

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yup, and that’s partly where my suggestion of “chips” came from. The money term isn’t a huge deal, but just changing the name to something relevant in world is cool.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I guess you don’t need a king, since sovereign refers to the government, but when it comes to currency, I’d assume “sovereign” is referring to the picture of the ruler on the currency. I don’t know many who call their chief executive/head of state a “sovereign”, but most would use that to describe a monarch.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if money was just called hours?

    Difficult jobs are worth more hours than easy jobs and require more specialized skills. If the specific skill is not part of the repertoire then the job will be exceptionally difficult and/or impossible.