• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    6111 months ago

    Piracy isn’t stealing anyway. You’re not removing the data from the original owner.

    • @shrugal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      But the original creation cost time and money, which you’re not reimbursing the creator for. The moral thing to do is to pay your share of that if you make a copy, even if the copy itself doesn’t cost anything.

      It’s like going to a concert without paying the entrance fee. Sure it’s not a big deal if only one person does it, but the concert couldn’t even happen if everyone acted like this, or the organizers would have to pay for it all by themselves.

      If you want to morally justify piracy then start with the ridiculous earnings and monopolies of big media companies, or the fact that they will just remove your access to media you “bought”. Piracy is like stealing, but sometimes stealing is the right thing to do.

      • MaggiWuerze
        link
        fedilink
        1511 months ago

        Would you call it Piracy if I lend a bluray from a friend? I didn’t pay for it and yet I’ve watched it.

        • @shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          No, because it’s so widespread and natural that it should be expected and already accounted for in the price. But there is no hard line imo, and simplified examples often fail to capture all the aspects that go into the decision. E.g. I’d say paying for one person at a concert and sneaking in another would basically be piracy, even though the two situations are very similar on a surface level.

          I think it’s about reasonable expectations both parties of the agreement can have, based on established social norms. If you buy a movie for personal consumption you should be able to expect that you can watch it whenever you want, and also share that experience with friends and family. And at the same time the seller should be able to expect that you limit it to a reasonable number of personal contacts, and don’t start to sell it to strangers or run a movie theater, because that expectation was used to set the price.

          • Norgur
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            So if piracy was “widespread and natural” it’d be bueno?

            • @shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              If that would be possible then yes, or course.

              That’s bascially the Start Trek future, where everybody’s needs are met and people can just do whatever they want. It doesn’t “cost” anything to create stuff, so it’s fine to copy everything for free. But that’s not the reality we are living in. In our’s somebody has to pay for things, and if everyone pirated everything then things couldn’t be made anymore.

              An example where it kinda works is open source software. People don’t charge for copies, because they expect to get help with their work and also be allowed to use other OS software without paying for it. As long as that balance holds it works out fine, but there are a lot of projects that required too much investment from the creator’s and didn’t provide enough back for them to keep going. And even there, companies profiting from OS projects are expected or even required to pay it back, by contributing code and paying for engineers and sponsorships.

        • @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          To further the thought experiment. I digitize my Blu-ray and put it on a private tracker to share with ONLY my friends. Is that piracy?

          Copywrite laws are antiquated at best and need to be destroyed at worst.

          If you need more proof look at bullshit like how Paramount+ until recently couldn’t show flagship shows like Picard in Canada because the rights were given to Crave.

          So as a consumer I want to go to the owner of the property and I can’t watch it because the owner told me they gave a copy of it to someone else.

      • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        The moral thing to do is to pay your share of that if you make a copy, even if the copy itself doesn’t cost anything.

        under what ethical system?

        • @shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Mine, obviously. But feel free to correct me if you disagree with something.

          • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            there’s no reason to believe what you claimed. a claim made without justification can be dismissed without justification.

            • @shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              What unjustified claim did I make that you disagree with? Seems all rather uncontroversial to me.

              • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                The moral thing to do is to pay your share of that if you make a copy, even if the copy itself doesn’t cost anything.

                i don’t need to disagree to disbelieve. i do disagree, but without establishing your justification for this claim, it’s kind of hard to argue against it.

                • @shrugal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  The justification was that creating things has a cost, even if a copy doesn’t, and that we should distribute that cost as fairly as possible among the people benefiting from the creation.

            • @MJBrune@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              They made a justification. They showed you how people couldn’t make these things without people paying for them.

              • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                They showed you how people couldn’t make these things without people paying for them.

                but that’s not true. people make things all the time without being paid.

                • @MJBrune@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  people make things all the time without being paid.

                  Less people make things without being paid than those who make things to get paid. That is a common fact we can both agree on. If you need the number of open source games compared to the number of paid games then I recommend you grab those numbers yourself.

                  • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    there are over one hundred fifty thousand results on github for “tictactoe”.

                    just how many paid games do you think there are, by the way?

                  • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    this doesn’t prove anyone ever needs to be paid to make something. a single counter example disproves the claim.

                  • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    github shows a hundred thousand repositories for the query “hangman”. assuming 10% of them are false positives it’s still a great number.

      • @Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s like going to a concert without paying the entrance fee. Sure it’s not a big deal if only one person does it, but the concert couldn’t even happen if everyone acted like this

        That’s a systemic problem, something I wouldn’t personally care about. The “system” is just so horribly screwed up and skewed against us that I just no longer care if it works or not.

        If you want to morally justify piracy then start with the ridiculous earnings and monopolies of big media companies, or the fact that they will just remove your access to media you “bought”. Piracy is like stealing, but sometimes stealing is the right thing to do.

        This rubs me the wrong way too, yes. Though I’m really beyond moral justifications, I just stopped caring.

        • Iapar
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Same here. The world is unjust so act accordingly.

          Which doesn’t mean be an asshole to everybody and steal everything you can but be an asshole to assholes and steal from franchises.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      How do you feel about jumping the turnstile at a train station?

            • Rentlar
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              Some countries have a blank media fee on writable casettes, discs and hard drives that are paid to music and movie studios for this purpose.

              • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                511 months ago

                And yet: Netflix prevents me from recording any of their shows and sharing the recording with my friends and family.

                • @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  411 months ago

                  I get that the economy we’re in means a bunch of people, like yourself, feel justified in entertaining themselves using whatever means they can afford. I’d be lying if I said I never pirated music when I was a broke highschooler.

                  But the reality is, if the funding isn’t there, it doesn’t happen. I don’t think DRM is the ethical way to squeeze money out of your audience, nor do I think not compensating people who worked hard to create something you enjoy is the ethical way to consume media.

                  If you liked it, and you can afford it, pay them a fair price for your experience. Artists are already starving without society having a “copying isn’t stealing” mentality. It doesn’t matter if it’s Netflix, or a busker; you’re not paying them for a physical thing that they hand you, you’re paying them for the effort they went to craft an experience for you.

                  • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    211 months ago

                    Don’t get me wrong: I pay for my indie games and don’t have the time for the so-called “triple-AAA” crap.

                    But the money I’d pay to Netflix or Spotify won’t actually go to the artists who worked on the stuff. That’s just not how this works.

                    Most imortantly: I don’t want to shame anyone for pay/not paying, as I usually don’t know their financial situtation.

                  • Saik0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Artists are already starving without society having a “copying isn’t stealing” mentality.

                    If labels didn’t take huge chunks of their income… with very little return on their part. Guess what…

                    This actually isn’t a problem with the consumers, it’s a problem with the “production” side of this equation.

                    or a busker

                    A busker doesn’t hold my files I create via video recording on my phone of the “event” hostage… under threat of lawsuit/men with guns beating down my door and taking all my electronics.

                    you’re not paying them for a physical thing that they hand you, you’re paying them for the effort they went to craft an experience for you.

                    No I’m not. I’m paying to own the disc/content. I couldn’t give a damn what “experience” they think they’re creating. But it’s in their best interest that the “experience” is worthwhile so I purchase the next one.

                  • Rentlar
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    You make a decent point, but the disconnect between people paying for content and the money going to the people who contributed effort to it is getting wider and wider.

                    Popular shows that people subscribed for get axed after 1 season or moved to another service. All the work people did for Warner Brothers’ Batgirl gets thrown in the trash so that WB can get a tax write-off, before any movie watcher can even give a cent to them in support.

                    The point is big studios make so much year after year that pirating their stuff doesn’t make a dent in whether the people they hire get paid accordingly.

      • Vodulas [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        2711 months ago

        Amoral at worst. Public transportation shouldn’t have a fee at use. Tax the rich, invest in transport

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Not asking about the morality, asking whether or not the people making this argument on piracy consider jumping the turnstile to be theft, in the most practical sense. Not in an ideal world, but in the real world, would you consider that theft?

          A turnstile jumper is also exploiting the products and services produced by offers without paying the cost to use them. Nothing is being “removed” in that situation either.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              What would you call taking or using something without paying for it, then? Resources are still being spent to transport the person who has not paid for them.

                • Chozo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  511 months ago

                  The transportation authority who maintains the trains and stations.

                  • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    3
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Only if the rides are a scarce resource. Which they aren’t. Nothing that some customer could have bought is removed by jumping a turnstyle.

                  • Vodulas [they/them]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 months ago

                    I think I figured out the disconnect here. Yes, hopping a turnstile is against the law. It is still not considered theft. It is called fare evasion, and it is more akin to a traffic violation. The reason I was confused, and why I assumed you meant morality, is that nobody is saying piracy isn’t against the law. The article never said that either.

          • Unaware7013
            link
            fedilink
            911 months ago

            Jumping a turnstile and taking a physical, actually scarce resource is not comparable to duplicating a digital, artificially scarce resource.

            The train requires ongoing maintenance and can only hold a finite amount of people. Taking the train seat for free takes away something from another person. Downloading media does not use any ongoing resources, and does not take anything away from another consumer.

            Comparing the morality of physical goods to digital goods are not really a good comparison specifically because of the artificial scarcity brought on by making something digital to try to make it more expensive doesn’t map to the real scarcity of physical goods.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              Again, I have to ask: How do you think those digital goods are made in the first place? Somebody labored to create it. They deserve to be paid for it.

              Not sure why this is such a hot take.

              • @mkhoury@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                How much should they be paid for it? In a situation where the streaming services have a stranglehold on the market and are extracting a big amount in rent-seeking price vs actually paying the people who labored to create it, should we continue to pay and give in to their morally dubious tactics? In this lens, can piracy be considered a form of civil disobedience?

                • Chozo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  How much should they be paid for it?

                  However much they’re asking. They put a price tag on it for exactly this question.

                  In this lens, can piracy be considered a form of civil disobedience?

                  Not really. Civil disobedience is about refusing to follow a law, not choosing to break a law. There’s a difference between the two concepts; one involves going about your day as normal and ignoring laws, and the other is going out of your way to break a law. Piracy is no more a form of civil disobedience than looting a grocery store is.

                  • @mkhoury@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    211 months ago

                    Ah, that’s not my understanding of civil disobedience. I prefer this definition: “civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies” (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/)

                    I suppose the piracy aspect might not be public enough to count as civil disobedience though, unless you count as public the noticeable cumulative effects of all piracy.

      • ZephrC
        link
        fedilink
        1911 months ago

        Depends on the circumstances I guess, but no matter how I feel about it people jumping the turnstile aren’t stealing the train.

        • Are they stealing a ride?

          I don’t like this analogy, because there’s a real, albeit small, cost to the subway of that free ride, in terms of fuel and increased maintenance. Digital piracy has literaly no real cost to the producer except the nebulous “lost sale.”

          • @risottinopazzesco@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            It should be a free service anyway. Without free public transport, democracy does not exists. Same reason healthcare and education should be. So sure, you are “stealing” a ride - something that should be yours anyway because people are not born with the ability to travel kilometers of cityscapes, something that is now mandatory to survive and thrive.

          • @SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            You’re also potentially blocking a seat that could be used by a paying passenger, and the operator will statistically run more/longer trains at higher cost to cope with increased demand.

          • Chozo
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            Digital piracy has literaly no real cost to the producer except the nebulous “lost sale.”

            You know that the pirated files were stolen in the first place, right? Movies and video games aren’t just sitting out in the open free for somebody to snatch up like apples on a tree. They end up in the hands of scene groups by somebody in the studio taking an unauthorized copy of the product and distributing it.

            Lost sales are damages, as demonstrated by the courts hundreds and hundreds of times over now.

            • @jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              1311 months ago

              Ever heard of “ripping” a disk, a stream, or a download? Movies, series, and video games get paid for by someone who then proceeds to make unauthorized copies, they very rarely come from anyone at the studio.

              Lost sales are “legal” damages, which doesn’t mean they’re actual loss of anything, since people who were not going to pay, are worth exactly $0.

              It’s different when bootleg copies get sold, since then there is an actual payment that isn’t going to the right person.

              • Chozo
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Does you license plate say “PRIVATE”? Because this is some real sovereign citizen logic, using definitions of terms that the rest of the world doesn’t agree with.

                Ever read the message at the beginning of a rip? You know, the one with the FBI logo on it. Remind me what it says?

                • @jarfil@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  using definitions of terms that the rest of the world doesn’t agree with.

                  Like which one exactly?

                  Ever read the message at the beginning of a rip? You know, the one with the FBI logo on it. Remind me what it says?

                  There is none. Some rips used to come with a “Ripped by [some nick]” and a scene group logo, but they’ve grown out of fashion.

                  Just kidding, I know you meant this one: https://youtu.be/CXca40Z01Ss

                  • Chozo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 months ago

                    Like which one exactly?

                    “people who were not going to pay” is not one singular group, but you use this as if everybody who isn’t going to pay is part of the same demographic. Some people won’t pay because they don’t want it in the first place. Some people won’t pay because while they want it, they can’t afford it. And some won’t pay but will take it anyway because they feel entitled to it.

                    Painting all these groups with the same brush is disingenuous at best, and intentionally deceptive at worst.

            • Rentlar
              link
              fedilink
              611 months ago

              Many scene groups actually purchased the games and cracked them, I’ve read NFOs that say “buy the game, we did too”.

              People recording in movie theatres have to either sneak into the theatre or buy a ticket themselves.

              Someone scanning a book to post online had to have bought it or borrowed it.

              Yes some games are cracks of illegitimate obtained leaked copies or other unscrupulous methods.

              I have played pirated games in the past but my Steam library has thousands of dollars worth of games I bought, many of which I wouldn’t have if I weren’t interested in these type of games to begin had pirating games not been possible.

              Sure, the opportunity cost from piracy’s “lost sales” to the publisher/licensor is non-zero. But how many sales that would have happened varies greatly on the perceived value vs. price of the product, and how available it is. If it’s not in stores anymore and can only be bought from scalpers on eBay, the publisher cough Nintendo cough doesn’t see that money anyway vs. pirating it.

            • I have hundreds of CDs, which are bought and paid for. Tell me, again, how making copies and (hypothically, of course) giving them to friend[1] incurs a direct cost to the CD producer?

              Nearly all pirated content was most likely originally purchased once, and ripped. There’s no evidence that much of it is from shoplifted DVDs.

              • Chozo
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Nearly all pirated content was most likely originally purchased once, and ripped. There’s no evidence that much of it is from shoplifted DVDs.

                There’s no evidence that “much” of it is from purchased DVDs, either.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          No, they’re just stealing the fuel and wages the employees should be getting for maintaining the train.

          • ZephrC
            link
            fedilink
            1811 months ago

            The employees don’t get paid less if some jumps the turnstile, the fuel cost to carry a single person is completely trivial, and I didn’t say nobody should care about turnstile jumpers. I said its not stealing. If you damage the tracks and cause the train to derail you’re a monster, and there are financial costs, but you still didn’t steal the train. Your argument doesn’t make any sense.

              • ZephrC
                link
                fedilink
                811 months ago

                Maybe, but it’s also closer to the price saved on less wear and tear on the turnstile than it is the price of the ticket.

            • AnonStoleMyPants
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              So are you arguing that turnstile jumpers are harming the company, but they are not stealing the service / train / ride? Like the literal word “steal”.

              • ZephrC
                link
                fedilink
                511 months ago

                Yes. That is in fact what I am arguing. I would also argue that the harm is tiny and can sometimes be justifiable, depending on the circumstances, but yes. It absolutely does do some non-zero harm, and yes there is no thing being stolen. That is the argument I am making.

                • AnonStoleMyPants
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  Yeah alright makes sense. Sometimes it hard to know what people are exactly arguing about.

          • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Ok, then make the trains a public service, collect taxes for it and make puplic transport free.

            Analogous to the whole “piracy” discourse: Manage more media like libraries.

      • jamesravey
        link
        fedilink
        1411 months ago

        I dunno, I mean are the train company allowed to take my money and then go “sorry we fell out with the fuel company so we’re just gonna keep your money and not take you to your destination. Soz babe x”

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        I don’t see how that compares. Trains need human labour and lots of resources to function.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          How do you think movies, music, games, books, or any form of media is produced?

          • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Operating a train is not creating a train. And media does not require resources to operate, so nothing is lost when digital media is used by someone without paying.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              411 months ago

              so nothing is lost when digital media is used by someone without paying.

              Using, no. Acquiring, yes.

              • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                1311 months ago

                No, nothing was lost when the copy was acquired, because copying does not remove the original. Literally, nothing is lost.

                • Chozo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  5
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Lost sales are considered damages, so yes something is lost.

                  EDIT: This is worse than arguing with SovCits.

                  • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Bruh, no one in here is arguing about legality, we’re arguing about morality, and no one but corporate shills buy into “potential sales” having value.

                    You’re trying to argue against what people just fundamentally, intuitively understand; copyright is a legal construct (not a moral one) that is 99% bullshit.